Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19317439›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2009

Estimation of molecular acidity via electrostatic potential at the nucleus and valence natural atomic orbitals.

Shubin Liu, Lee G Pedersen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shubin LiuResearch Computing Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3420, USA. shubin@email.unc.edu
Lee G Pedersen
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

THE ROLE OF THE VITAMIN K CYCLE IN COAGULATIONP01HL006350 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MONROE, DOUGALD M · 1985 to 2013
$17.5M
Macromolecular ModelingZIAES043010 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PEDERSEN, LEE · 2009 to 2011
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-06350NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL006350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective approach of estimating molecular pK(a) values from simple density functional calculations is proposed in this work. Both the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) at the nucleus of the acidic atom and the sum of valence natural atomic orbitals are employed for three categories of compounds, amines and anilines, carbonyl acids and alcohols, and sulfonic acids and thiols. A strong correlation between experimental pK(a) values and each of these two quantities for each of the three categories has been discovered. Moreover, if the MEP is subtracted by the isolated atomic MEP for each category of compounds, we observe a single unique linear relationship between the resultant MEP difference and experimental pK(a) data of amines, anilines, carbonyl acids, alcohols, sulfonic acids, thiols, and their substituents. These results can generally be utilized to simultaneously estimate pK(a) values at multiple sites with a single calculation for either relatively small molecules in drug design or amino acids in proteins and macromolecules.

Indexed as

Static ElectricityHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOrganic ChemicalsQuantum TheoryOrganic Chemicals

Identifiers

PMID19317439
PMCPMC2670071
OpenAlexW1986143909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.