Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19309488›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2009

Patients' perceptions and experiences of transitions in diabetes care: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Julia Lawton, David Rankin, Elizabeth Peel, Margaret Douglas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Type 2 diabetes and dog walking: patients' longitudinal perspectives about implementing and sustaining physical activity.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  12. When service users' support obscures problems with care: the need for rigorous research into patients' experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia LawtonCentre for Population Health Sciences, Community Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, UK. j.lawton@ed.ac.uk
David Rankin
Elizabeth Peel
Margaret Douglas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine patients' perceptions and experiences over time of the devolvement of diabetes care/reviews from secondary to primary health-care settings.

designRepeat in-depth interviews with 20 patients over 4 years. PARTICIPANTS AND

settingTwenty type 2 diabetes patients recruited from primary- and secondary-care settings across Lothian, Scotland.

resultsPatients' views about their current diabetes care were informed by their previous service contact. The devolvement of diabetes care/reviews to general practice was presented as a 'mixed blessing'. Patients gained reassurance from their perception that receiving practice-based care/reviews signified that their diabetes was well-controlled. However, they also expressed resentment that, by achieving good control, they received what they saw as inferior care and/or less-frequent reviews to others with poorer control. While patients tended to regard GPs as having adequate expertise to conduct their practice-based reviews, they were more ambivalent about nurses taking on this role. Opportunities to receive holistic care in general practice were not always realized due to patients seeing health-care professionals for diabetes management to whom they would not normally present for other health issues.

conclusionsIt is important to educate patients about their care pathways, and to reassure them that frequency of reviews depends more on clinical need than location of care and that similar care guidelines are followed in hospital clinics and general practice. A patients' history of service contact may need to be taken into account in future studies of service satisfaction.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedScotlandUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID19309488
PMCPMC5060480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.