Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19309361›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2009

Different response patterns of several ligands at the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P(3)).

M Jongsma, J van Unen, P B van Loenen, M C Michel, S L M Peters, A E Alewijnse

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Rationale for Use of Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in COVID-19 Patients: Overview of Scientific Evidence.Journal of interferon & cytokine research : the official journal of the International Society for Interferon and Cytokine Research · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The year in G protein-coupled receptor research.Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M JongsmaDepartment of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J van Unen
P B van Loenen
M C Michel
S L M Peters
A E Alewijnse
Academic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecently, some ligands targeting the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor subtype 3 (S1P(3)) have become available. The characterization of these compounds was mainly based on one functional read-out system, although S1P(3) receptors are known to activate different signal transduction pathways. Therefore, this study pharmacologically characterizes these compounds using different assays. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Using CHO-FlpIn cells expressing the human S1P(3) receptor the potencies and maximal effects of S1P, FTY720-P, VPC23019, VPC23153 and VPC24191 were determined in three different assays [inhibition of cAMP accumulation, elevation of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca(2+)](i)) and S1P(3) receptor internalization]. KEY

resultsAll compounds tested inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, increased [Ca(2+)](i) and induced S1P(3) receptor internalization but with different potencies and maximal effects. S1P was the most potent compound in all assays followed by FTY720-P. The VPC compounds were generally less potent than S1P and FTY720-P. Regarding the maximal effects, all compounds except VPC23153, behaved as full agonists in the cAMP accumulation assay. In the calcium assay, FTY720-P, VPC23019 and VPC24191 displayed partial and VPC23153 weak partial agonist activity, relative to S1P. Interestingly, treatment with the G(i) inactivator Pertussis toxin, did not affect S1P-induced [Ca(2+)](i) elevations but inhibited those in response to the other compounds, by about 50%. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrated differential response patterns at the S1P(3) receptor for a range of ligands. These differences could indicate the presence of functional selectivity at this receptor as FTY720-P and the VPC compounds seemed to signal predominantly via G(i)- whereas S1P activated G(i) and G(q)-coupled pathways.

Indexed as

Adenylyl CyclasesAnimalsCalcium SignalingCHO CellsColforsinCricetinaeCricetulusCyclic AMPDose-Response Relationship, DrugEndocytosisEnzyme ActivationEnzyme ActivatorsGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11HumansLigandsAdenylyl CyclasesColforsinCyclic AMPEnzyme ActivatorsFTY 720PGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gi-GoGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gq-G11LigandsLysophospholipidsOrganophosphatesPertussis ToxinReceptors, LysosphingolipidSphingosinesphingosine 1-phosphate

Identifiers

PMID19309361
PMCPMC2697734
OpenAlexW2127164663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.