Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19308376›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2009

Pancreatitis and the role of US, MRCP and ERCP.

Kassa Darge, Sudha Anupindi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for Cholangiopancreatic Duct Imaging in Dogs.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The role of imaging in acute pancreatitis.La Radiologia medica · 2021
    Article
  10. Current State of Imaging of Pediatric Pancreatitis:AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021
    Review
  11. Imaging Inflammation and Infection in the Gastrointestinal Tract.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Ultrasonography: Applications in Pediatric Abdomen.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2016
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kassa DargeDivision of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4399, USA. darge@email.chop.edu
Sudha Anupindi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pancreatitis in children. Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality. The US study can be improved by incorporating high resolution imaging, color Doppler, harmonic imaging and panorama view. Computer tomography (CT) is widely used for further evaluation. MR imaging in combination with MR cholangiopancreaticography (MRCP) is emerging as the modality of choice. It is non-invasive and radiation-free. It has high potential to replace endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP), too. The latter is becoming more of an interventional tool. This review discusses the current status and comparative diagnostic potential of US, MRCP and ERCP.

Indexed as

ChildCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesPancreatitisPediatricsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.