Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19308334›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2009

Not perfect, but better: primary care providers' experiences with electronic referrals in a safety net health system.

Yeuen Kim, Alice Hm Chen, Ellen Keith, Hal F Yee, Margot B Kushel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02376855 (A Study of the Implementation of an Electronic Consultation), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02376855 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Study of the Implementation of an Electronic Consultation ("eConsult") Platform to Increase Specialist Access for Patients in Underserved Populations: Impact on Provider Experience, Wait Times and Cost

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommunity Health Center, Inc.Ran2011 to 2013Enrolled36ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmseConsult
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Decision Support Systems for Healthcare Referral Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yeuen KimDivision of Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA 95128, USA.
Alice Hm Chen
Ellen Keith
Hal F Yee
Margot B Kushel

Funding

PHS HHS T32 HP19025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic referrals can improve access to subspecialty care in safety net settings. In January 2007, San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) launched an electronic referral portal that incorporated subspecialist triage, iterative communication with referring providers, and existing electronic health record data to improve access to subspecialty care.

objectiveWe surveyed primary care providers (PCPs) to assess the impact of electronic referrals on workflow and clinical care.

designWe administered an 18-item, web-based questionnaire to all 368 PCPs who had the option of referring to SFGH. MEASUREMENTS: We asked participants to rate time spent submitting a referral, guidance of workup, wait times, and change in overall clinical care compared to prior referral methods using 5-point Likert scales. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify variables associated with perceived improvement in overall clinical care.

resultsTwo hundred ninety-eight PCPs (81.0%) from 24 clinics participated. Over half (55.4%) worked at hospital-based clinics, 27.9% at county-funded community clinics, and 17.1% at non-county-funded community clinics. Most (71.9%) reported that electronic referrals had improved overall clinical care. Providers from non-county-funded clinics (AOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14-0.79) and those who spent > or =6 min submitting an electronic referral (AOR 0.33, 95%CI 0.18-0.61) were significantly less likely than other participants to report that electronic referrals had improved clinical care.

conclusionsPCPs felt electronic referrals improved health-care access and quality; those who reported a negative impact on workflow were less likely to agree. While electronic referrals hold promise as a tool to improve clinical care, their impact on workflow should be considered.

Indexed as

Physician's RoleCommunity Health PlanningHumansInternetMedical Order Entry SystemsPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19308334
PMCPMC2669877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.