Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19308253›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

High-throughput proteomics detection of novel splice isoforms in human platelets.

Karen A Power, James P McRedmond, Andreas de Stefani, William M Gallagher, Peadar O Gaora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Multimerin-1 and cancer: a review.Bioscience reports · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Genes & cancer · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The importance of identifying alternative splicing in vertebrate genome annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen A PowerUCD Conway Institute and UCD School of Biomolecular & Biomedical Sciences, UCD Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
James P McRedmond
Andreas de Stefani
William M Gallagher
Peadar O Gaora

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) is an intrinsic regulatory mechanism of all metazoans. Recent findings suggest that 100% of multiexonic human genes give rise to splice isoforms. AS can be specific to tissue type, environment or developmentally regulated. Splice variants have also been implicated in various diseases including cancer. Detection of these variants will enhance our understanding of the complexity of the human genome and provide disease-specific and prognostic biomarkers. We adopted a proteomics approach to identify exon skip events - the most common form of AS. We constructed a database harboring the peptide sequences derived from all hypothetical exon skip junctions in the human genome. Searching tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data against the database allows the detection of exon skip events, directly at the protein level. Here we describe the application of this approach to human platelets, including the mRNA-based verification of novel splice isoforms of ITGA2, NPEPPS and FH. This methodology is applicable to all new or existing MS/MS datasets.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBlood PlateletsDatabases, FactualExonsGenome, HumanHumansMass SpectrometryMetalloendopeptidasesPeptidesProtein IsoformsProteomicsRNA, MessengerMetalloendopeptidasesNPEPPS protein, humanPeptidesProtein IsoformsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19308253
PMCPMC2654914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.