Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19308066›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2009

Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms.

Howard Cedar, Yehudit Bergman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,177 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,177citing papers in PubMed
66.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,177 citing papers in PubMed, 2,272 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Multiscale modeling primer: Focus on chromatin and epigenetics.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Epigenetic Connections in Malocclusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1,117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Howard CedarDepartment of Developmental Biology and Cancer Research, Hebrew University Medical School, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. cedar@cc.huji.ac.il
Yehudit Bergman
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both DNA methylation and histone modification are involved in establishing patterns of gene repression during development. Certain forms of histone methylation cause local formation of heterochromatin, which is readily reversible, whereas DNA methylation leads to stable long-term repression. It has recently become apparent that DNA methylation and histone modification pathways can be dependent on one another, and that this crosstalk can be mediated by biochemical interactions between SET domain histone methyltransferases and DNA methyltransferases. Relationships between DNA methylation and histone modification have implications for understanding normal development as well as somatic cell reprogramming and tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAnimalsDNADNA-Cytosine MethylasesHeterochromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistonesHumansModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsDNADNA-Cytosine MethylasesHeterochromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHistone MethyltransferasesHistones

Identifiers

PMID19308066
OpenAlexW1976626368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.