Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19307305›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2009

Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability.

Christian J Wippo, Bojana Silic Krstulovic, Franziska Ertel, Sanja Musladin, Dorothea Blaschke, Sabrina Stürzl, Guo-Cheng Yuan, Wolfram Hörz, Philipp Korber, Slobodan Barbaric

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nucleosome Remodeling at the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. The Active Mechanism of Nucleosome Depletion by Poly(dA:dT) Tracts In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian J WippoAdolf-Butenandt-Institut, Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Bojana Silic Krstulovic
Franziska Ertel
Sanja Musladin
Dorothea Blaschke
Sabrina Stürzl
Guo-Cheng Yuan
Wolfram Hörz
Philipp Korber
Slobodan Barbaric
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Zagreb · HRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We showed previously that the strong PHO5 promoter is less dependent on chromatin cofactors than the weaker coregulated PHO8 promoter. In this study we asked if chromatin remodeling at the even stronger PHO84 promoter was correspondingly less cofactor dependent. The repressed PHO84 promoter showed a short hypersensitive region that was flanked upstream and downstream by a positioned nucleosome and contained two transactivator Pho4 sites. Promoter induction generated an extensive hypersensitive and histone-depleted region, yielding two more Pho4 sites accessible. This remodeling was strictly Pho4 dependent, strongly dependent on the remodelers Snf2 and Ino80 and on the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5, and more weakly on the acetyltransferase Rtt109. Importantly, remodeling of each of the two positioned nucleosomes required Snf2 and Ino80 to different degrees. Only remodeling of the upstream nucleosome was strictly dependent on Snf2. Further, remodeling of the upstream nucleosome was more dependent on Ino80 than remodeling of the downstream nucleosome. Both nucleosomes differed in their intrinsic stabilities as predicted in silico and measured in vitro. The causal relationship between the different nucleosome stabilities and the different cofactor requirements was shown by introducing destabilizing mutations in vivo. Therefore, chromatin cofactor requirements were determined by intrinsic nucleosome stabilities rather than correlated to promoter strength.

Indexed as

Promoter Regions, GeneticBase SequenceBinding SitesChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyGene Expression Regulation, FungalHistonesKineticsNucleic Acid ConformationNucleosomesProton-Phosphate SymportersSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSequence DeletionTATA BoxTranscription, GeneticHistonesNucleosomesPHO84 protein, S cerevisiaeProton-Phosphate SymportersSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19307305
PMCPMC2682004
OpenAlexW2138954322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.