Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19307209›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2009

Cryptococcus neoformans directly stimulates perforin production and rearms NK cells for enhanced anticryptococcal microbicidal activity.

Kaleb J Marr, Gareth J Jones, Chunfu Zheng, Shaunna M Huston, Martina Timm-McCann, Anowara Islam, Byron M Berenger, Ling Ling Ma, Jeremy C D Wiseman, Christopher H Mody

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. State of the Field: Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Innate Pulmonary Phagocytes and Their Interactions with PathogenicJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Immune Cell Degranulation in Fungal Host Defence.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. NK Cells and Their Role in Invasive Mold Infection.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  15. Natural Killer Cells in Antifungal Immunity.Frontiers in immunology · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Innate host defenses against Cryptococcus neoformans.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaleb J MarrDepartment of Medical Science, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gareth J Jones
Chunfu Zheng
Shaunna M Huston
Martina Timm-McCann
Anowara Islam
Byron M Berenger
Ling Ling Ma
Jeremy C D Wiseman
Christopher H Mody
University of Calgary · CAWuhan Institute of Virology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NK cells, in addition to possessing antitumor and antiviral activity, exhibit perforin-dependent microbicidal activity against the opportunistic pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. However, the factors controlling this response, particularly whether the pathogen itself provides an activation or rearming signal, are largely unknown. The current studies were performed to determine whether exposure to this fungus alters subsequent NK cell anticryptococcal activity. NK cells lost perforin and mobilized lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 to the cell surface following incubation with the fungus, indicating that degranulation had occurred. Despite a reduced perforin content during killing, NK cells acquired an enhanced ability to kill C. neoformans, as demonstrated using auxotrophs that allowed independent assessment of the killing of two strains. De novo protein synthesis was required for optimal killing; however, there was no evidence that a soluble factor contributed to the enhanced anticryptococcal activity. Exposure of NK cells to C. neoformans caused the cells to rearm, as demonstrated by increased perforin mRNA levels and enhanced loss of perforin when transcription was blocked. Degranulation alone was insufficient to provide the activation signal as NK cells lost anticryptococcal activity following treatment with strontium chloride. However, NK cells regained the activity upon prolonged exposure to C. neoformans, which is consistent with activation by the microbe. The enhanced cytotoxicity did not extend to tumor killing since NK cells exposed to C. neoformans failed to kill NK-sensitive tumor targets (K562 cells). These studies demonstrate that there is contact-mediated microbe-specific rearming and activation of microbicidal activity that are necessary for optimal killing of C. neoformans.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityCell DegranulationCell LineColony Count, MicrobialCryptococcus neoformansHumansKiller Cells, NaturalPerforinRNA, MessengerPerforinRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19307209
PMCPMC2687353
OpenAlexW2134245901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.