ReviewMolecular carcinogenesis2009
Every microsatellite is different: Intrinsic DNA features dictate mutagenesis of common microsatellites present in the human genome.
Review in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 132 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of ensilication technology for ambient DNA preservation.NAR molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Lights and shadows of microsatellite status characterization in gastrointestinal cancers in the era of cancer precision therapy.Pathologica · 2025Review
- A detailed analysis of second and third-generation sequencing approaches for accurate length determination of short tandem repeats and homopolymers.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- SINE retrotransposons import polyadenylation signals to 3'UTRs in dog (Canis familiaris).Mobile DNA · 2025Article
- Beyond PD(L)-1 Blockade in Microsatellite-Instable Cancers: Current Landscape of Immune Co-Inhibitory Receptor Targeting.Cancers · 2024Review
- Sequence variants affecting the genome-wide rate of germline microsatellite mutations.Nature communications · 2023Article
- The sequence of the repetitive motif influences the frequency of multistep mutations in Short Tandem Repeats.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- De novo variants and recombination at 4q35: Hints for preimplantation genetic testing in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.Clinical genetics · 2023Article
- ETV6 dependency in Ewing sarcoma by antagonism of EWS-FLI1-mediated enhancer activation.Nature cell biology · 2023Article
- A hypervariable intron of theFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- The mutational dynamics of short tandem repeats in large, multigenerational families.Genome biology · 2022Article
- Clinical prospects of WRN inhibition as a treatment for MSI tumours.NPJ precision oncology · 2022Review
- Mismatch repair is a double-edged sword in the battle against microsatellite instability.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Next generation sequencing of Y-STRs in father-son pairs and comparison with traditional capillary electrophoresis.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- CLCC1 c. 75C>A Mutation in Pakistani Derived Retinitis Pigmentosa Families Likely Originated With a Single Founder Mutation 2,000-5,000 Years Ago.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Gynecological Cancers Caused by Deficient Mismatch Repair and Microsatellite Instability.Cancers · 2020Review
- The Biological Significance of Multi-copy Regions and Their Impact on Variant Discovery.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Defects in the GINS complex increase the instability of repetitive sequences via a recombination-dependent mechanism.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microsatellite sequences are ubiquitous in the human genome and are important regulators of genome function. Here, we examine the mutational mechanisms governing the stability of highly abundant mono-, di-, and tetranucleotide microsatellites. Microsatellite mutation rate estimates from pedigree analyses and experimental models range from a low of approximately 10(-6) to a high of approximately 10(-2) mutations per locus per generation. The vast majority of observed mutational variation can be attributed to features intrinsic to the allele itself, including motif size, length, and sequence composition. A greater than linear relationship between motif length and mutagenesis has been observed in several model systems. Motif sequence differences contribute up to 10-fold to the variation observed in human cell mutation rates. The major mechanism of microsatellite mutagenesis is strand slippage during DNA synthesis. DNA polymerases produce errors within microsatellites at a frequency that is 10- to 100-fold higher than the frequency of frameshifts in coding sequences. Motif sequence significantly affects both polymerase error rate and specificity, resulting in strand biases within complementary microsatellites. Importantly, polymerase errors within microsatellites include base substitutions, deletions, and complex mutations, all of which produced interrupted alleles from pure microsatellites. Postreplication mismatch repair efficiency is affected by microsatellite motif size and sequence, also contributing to the observed variation in microsatellite mutagenesis. Inhibition of DNA synthesis within common microsatellites is highly sequence-dependent, and is positively correlated with the production of errors. DNA secondary structure within common microsatellites can account for some DNA polymerase pause sites, and may be an important factor influencing mutational specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.