Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19306050›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2009

Genetic testing before anticoagulation? A systematic review of pharmacogenetic dosing of warfarin.

Kirsten Neudoerffer Kangelaris, Stephen Bent, Robert L Nussbaum, David A Garcia, Jeffrey A Tice

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 39 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Optimal loading dose of warfarin for the initiation of oral anticoagulation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Design and evaluation of a pharmacogenomics information resource for pharmacists.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsten Neudoerffer KangelarisDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of California, Box 0131, 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA 94143-0131, USA. kkangelaris@medicine.ucsf.edu
Stephen Bent
Robert L Nussbaum
David A Garcia
Jeffrey A Tice

Funding

PHS HHS T32 HP19025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotype-guided initial warfarin dosing may reduce over-anticoagulation and serious bleeding compared to a one-dose-fits-all dosing method.

objectiveThe objective of this review was to investigate the safety and efficacy of genotype-guided dosing of warfarin in reducing the occurrence of serious bleeding events and over-anticoagulation. DATA SOURCES: The authors searched PubMed, EMBASE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 23, 2009, without language restrictions. Selected articles were randomized trials comparing pharmacogenetic dosing of warfarin versus a "standard" dose control algorithm in adult patients taking warfarin for the first time. REVIEW

methodsTwo reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using a validated instrument. The primary outcomes were major bleeding and time spent within the therapeutic range International Normalized Ratio (INR). Secondary outcomes included minor bleeding, thrombotic events and other measures of anticoagulation quality.

resultsThree of 2,014 studies (423 patients) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Differences in study quality, dosing algorithms, length of follow-up and outcome measures limited meta-analysis. Summary estimates revealed no statistically significant difference in bleeding rates or time within the therapeutic range INR. The highest quality study found no significant difference in primary or secondary outcomes, although there was a trend towards more rapid achievement of a stable dose (14.1 vs. 19.6 days, p = 0.07) in the pharmocogenetic arm.

conclusionsWe did not find sufficient evidence to support the use of pharmacogenetics to guide warfarin therapy. Additional clinical trials are needed to define the optimal approach to use warfarin pharmacogenetics in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsGenetic TestingHemorrhageHumansInternational Normalized RatioPharmacogeneticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWarfarinAnticoagulantsWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID19306050
PMCPMC2669873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.