ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2007
Innovations in the Ethical Review of Health-Related Quality Improvement and Research: The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI).
Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Cancer Patient Navigation: Lessons from an Evaluation of Navigation Services in Alberta, Canada.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Advancing a virtual home hospital: a blueprint for development and expansion.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Reducing healthcare waste by eliminating exam table paper in a primary care practice: a sustainable quality improvement initiative.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- The impact of advancing the standard of care in radiotherapy on operational treatment resources.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Outcomes Using a Standardized Provincial Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome Clinical Pathway.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2024Article
- Performance of a knowledge-based planning model for optimizing intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans for partial breast irradiation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Quality Improvement in Canadian Nephrology: Key Considerations in Ensuring Thoughtful Ethical Oversight.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2022Article
- Selection of Pediatric Mental Health Quality Measures for Health System Improvement in British Columbia Based on a Modified Delphi Approach.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Patient Reported Experience in a Pediatric Emergency Department.Journal of patient experience · 2020Article
- Article
- Ambulatory care unit role optimization for the specialized oncology nurse.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020Article
- Exploring the challenges of ethical conduct in quality improvement projects.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2020Article
- Temporal Trends in Selecting Patients for Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Cell Carcinomas in Alberta, Canada.Research and reports in urology · 2020Article
- Liver dose reduction by deep inspiration breath hold technique in right-sided breast irradiation.Radiation oncology journal · 2019Article
- Exposure to radiation and medical oncology training: A survey of Canadian urology residents and fellows.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
- Radiation therapy for deep periocular cancer treatments when protons are unavailable: is combining electrons and orthovoltage therapy beneficial?Journal of radiation research · 2018Article
- Clinical implementation of AXB from AAA for breast: Plan quality and subvolume analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2018Article
- Management delays in patients with squamous cell cancer of neck node(s) and unknown primary site: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2017Article
- Real-world adjuvant TAC or FEC-D for HER2-negative node-positive breast cancer in women less than 50 years of age.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2016Article
- Developing a provincial cancer patient navigation program utilizing a quality improvement approach Part two: Developing a Navigation Education Framework.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Alberta Research Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI) is a unique Canadian initiative that addresses the ethical oversight of two main categories of health-related investigative projects: research and quality improvement (including quality assurance and program evaluation). ARECCI was formed as a result of discussions arising from health regions, health researchers and the Alberta Committee of Research Ethics Boards (REBs) Chairs, who all desired a clearer and more consistent approach to the ethical oversight of investigative health projects. The Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) established and supported ARECCI in 2003 in response to this need. ARECCI is unique in its ongoing efforts to bring together a wide-ranging group of stakeholders to develop consensus on a set of pragmatic recommendations and tools for the ethical review of research and quality improvement, and to get extensive consultation on those recommendations. This paper presents the ARECCI context and process, recommendations and tools produced by ARECCI and lessons learned from the ongoing ARECCI process.
Identifiers
19305726PMC2585461W2057987495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.