Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19305416›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2009

Polo-like kinases: conservation and divergence in their functions and regulation.

Vincent Archambault, David M Glover

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 369 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
369citing papers in PubMed
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

369 citing papers in PubMed, 598 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

309 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent ArchambaultCancer Research UK, Cell Cycle Genetics Research Group, University of Cambridge, Department of Genetics, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EH, UK. va228@cam.ac.uk
David M Glover
Cancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilCancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0501718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polo-like kinases (Plks) are potent regulators of M phase that are conserved from yeasts to humans. Their roles in mitotic entry, spindle pole functions and cytokinesis are broadly conserved despite physical and molecular differences in these processes in disparate organisms. Plks are characterized by their Polo-box domain, which mediates protein interactions. They are additionally controlled by phosphorylation, proteolysis and transcription, depending on the biological context. Plks are now recognized to link cell division to developmental processes and to function in differentiated cells. A comparison of Plk function and regulation between organisms offers insight into the rich variations of cell division.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsHumansPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19305416
OpenAlexW2006401070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.