Trial reportJournal of lipid research2009

Effects of ezetimibe and simvastatin on apolipoprotein B metabolism in males with mixed hyperlipidemia.

André J Tremblay, Benoît Lamarche, Jean-Charles Hogue, Patrick Couture

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of lipid research, 2009. The graph read 5 numbers from its abstract, feeding 4 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. Cited by 22 papers.

5numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Plasma concentrations of cholesterolezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered vs placebono interval or p-value · dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -43.0
The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (-43.0%), LDL-C (-53.6%), and triglycerides (-44.0%).
Plasma concentrations of LDL-Cezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered vs placebono interval or p-value · dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -53.6
The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (-43.0%), LDL-C (-53.6%), and triglycerides (-44.0%).
TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR)ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered vs placebono interval or p-value · dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -38.0
Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS) was significantly decreased (-48.9%) following combination therapy mainly through a significant reduction in TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR) (-38.0%).
Plasma concentrations of triglyceridesezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered vs placebono interval or p-value · dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -44.0
The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (-43.0%), LDL-C (-53.6%), and triglycerides (-44.0%).
Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS)ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered vs placebono interval or p-value · dyslipidemiafeeds 2 cells of the map
Δ -48.9
Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS) was significantly decreased (-48.9%) following combination therapy mainly through a significant reduction in TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR) (-38.0%).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Other lipid agents×pharmacokinetics & dosing

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 1 favour the treatment, 0 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50one trial · 1 family supports, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT0086326522 enrolled · 2009
Δ 22.8

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Other lipid agents×lipids

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

28 readable studies in this cell: 17 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 9 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 15 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT004793881,216 enrolled · 2007
Δ -4.50-7.70 to -1.30
NCT00862251808 enrolled · 2009
Percent change in least-square means -14.8-19.6 to -9.91
NCT00485758796 enrolled · 2007
Δ -17.9-21.4 to -14.4
NCT00730132712 enrolled · 2008
Δ -5.75-9.43 to -2.07
NCT01763827615 enrolled · 2013
Δ -39.3-43.3 to -35.3
NCT01984424511 enrolled · 2013
Δ -37.8-42.3 to -33.3
NCT06005597407 enrolled · 2024
Least Squares (LS) Means -27.9-37.5 to -18.4
NCT03337308382 enrolled · 2017
Δ -38.0-46.5 to -29.6
NCT02227784366 enrolled · 2014
Δ -6.14-12.2 to -0.22
NCT01763905307 enrolled · 2013
Δ -38.1-43.7 to -33.0
NCT03001076269 enrolled · 2016
Δ -28.4-34.4 to -22.5

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×pharmacokinetics & dosing

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

2 readable studies in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 2 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.00contested · 0 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT00943124220 enrolled · 2007
Least-Squares Mean Ratio 0.970.93 to 1.00

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Statins×lipids

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

38 readable studies in this cell: 26 favour the treatment, 5 find no difference, 7 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 21 families support, 7 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT002899002,340 enrolled · 2006
Δ -13.2-16.8 to -9.60
reduced -66.0-73.0 to -58.0
NCT02546323543 enrolled · 2015
Δ -35.5-40.2 to -30.7
NCT01678820299 enrolled · 2012
Δ 0.50-4.80 to 5.80
NCT01218204287 enrolled · 2010
Δ 5.47-15.7 to 26.7
NCT0093525931 enrolled · 2009
Δ -51.7
reductions -33.6-38.8 to -28.4

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of Atherosclerosis Induced by Postprandial Lipemia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

André J TremblayLipid Research Center, CHUL Research Center, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
Benoît Lamarche
Jean-Charles Hogue
Patrick Couture
Dulbecco Telethon Institute · ITUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Sixteen hyperlipidemic men were enrolled in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study to evaluate the effect of ezetimibe 10 mg and simvastatin 40 mg, coadministered and alone, on the in vivo kinetics of apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 and B-100 in humans. Subjects underwent a primed-constant infusion of a stable isotope in the fed state. The coadministration of simvastatin and ezetimibe significantly reduced plasma concentrations of cholesterol (-43.0%), LDL-C (-53.6%), and triglycerides (-44.0%). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) apoB-48 pool size (PS) was significantly decreased (-48.9%) following combination therapy mainly through a significant reduction in TRL apoB-48 production rate (PR) (-38.0%). The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of VLDL and LDL apoB-100 were significantly increased with all treatment modalities compared with placebo, leading to a significant reduction in the PS of these fractions. We also observed a positive correlation between changes in TRL apoB-48 PS and changes in TRL apoB-48 PR (r = 0.85; P < 0.0001) with combination therapy. Our results indicate that treatment with simvastatin plus ezetimibe is effective in reducing plasma TRL apoB-48 levels and that this effect is most likely mediated by a reduction in the intestinal secretion of TRL apoB-48. Our study also indicated that the reduction in LDL-C concentration following combination therapy is mainly driven by an increase in FCR of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins.

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BAzetidinesCholesterol, LDLCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationEzetimibeHumansHyperlipidemiasLipoproteinsMalePlacebosSimvastatinAnticholesteremic AgentsApolipoproteins BAzetidinesCholesterol, LDLEzetimibeLipoproteinsPlacebosSimvastatinTriglycerides

Identifiers

PMID19305020
PMCPMC2694344
OpenAlexW2166344883

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.