ArticlePhysiology & behavior2009
Rapid acquisition of conditioned flavor preferences in rats.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combinative Protein Expression of Immediate Early Genes c-Fos, Arc, and Npas4 Along Aversive and Appetitive Experience-Related Neural Networks.Hippocampus · 2025Article
- Immediate glucose signaling transmitted via the vagus nerve in gut-brain neural communication.iScience · 2025Article
- Glucose appetition in C57BL/6J mice: Influence of nonnutritive sweetener experience, food deprivation state and sex differences.Physiology & behavior · 2024Article
- The impact of caloric availability on eating behavior and ultra-processed food reward.Appetite · 2022Article
- Learning of food preferences: mechanisms and implications for obesity & metabolic diseases.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2021Review
- Forty-eight hour conditioning produces a robust long lasting flavor preference in rats.Appetite · 2019Article
- The Functional and Neurobiological Properties of Bad Taste.Physiological reviews · 2019Review
- From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.Physiology & behavior · 2018Review
- Optimisation of cognitive performance in rodent operant (touchscreen) testing: Evaluation and effects of reinforcer strength.Learning & behavior · 2017Article
- Contexts control negative contrast and restrict the expression of flavor preference conditioning.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2016Article
- Does nutrient sensing determine how we "see" food?Current diabetes reports · 2015Review
- Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.Physiology & behavior · 2015Article
- Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.Physiology & behavior · 2014Article
- Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.Physiology & behavior · 2014Article
- Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.Appetite · 2013Review
- Neural circuits and motivational processes for hunger.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2013Review
- Effects of CB1 and CRF1 receptor antagonists on binge-like eating in rats with limited access to a sweet fat diet: lack of withdrawal-like responses.Physiology & behavior · 2012Article
- Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2012Review
- Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.Physiology & behavior · 2012Article
- Exposures to conditioned flavours with different hedonic values induce contrasted behavioural and brain responses in pigs.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rats learn to prefer flavors paired with the post-oral effects of glucose. The present study examined how rapidly they acquire this preference. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were given repeated three-session training/testing cycles: one 30-min session with a CS+ flavor paired with intragastric (IG) infusion of 16% glucose, another session with a CS- flavor paired with IG water, and a third session with a choice between the flavors with their infusates. The rats preferred the CS+ (69%) in the first choice session, and preference increased across the six cycles to 86%. These data demonstrate that the post-oral reinforcing action of glucose is potent enough to support one-trial learning. In Experiment 2, two groups of rats were trained in the same way, with the CS+ flavor paired with IG infusion of 16% glucose or 7.1% corn oil emulsion, but tests were conducted under extinction conditions, with both CS+ and CS- flavors paired with IG water. Significant preference for the CS+ was acquired more rapidly with glucose (71% CS+ in test 1) than with oil (69% CS+ in test 4). Consistent with previous work, the post-oral stimulation by glucose was more potent than that of isocaloric oil emulsion in conditioning preferences. The last experiment examined the acquisition rate for a flavor-taste conditioned preference. Rats were trained with a CS+ flavor mixed into an 8% fructose + 0.2% saccharin solution and a CS- flavor in 0.2% saccharin. The same three-session training/testing cycles were used, and in the tests the flavors were presented in saccharin. A significant 74% preference for the CS+ flavor was apparent by the second test. Together these studies show that the acquisition of flavor preferences, whether based on flavor-taste or flavor-nutrient associations, can be quite rapid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.