ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Statistical and visual differentiation of subcellular imaging.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of iron accumulation and its chelation on oxidative stress in intracortical implants.Acta biomaterialia · 2025Article
- Activation of inflammasomes and their effects on neuroinflammation at the microelectrode-tissue interface in intracortical implants.Biomaterials · 2023Article
- CellTrackVis: analyzing the performance of cell tracking algorithms.Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization : EUROVIS : [proceedings]. Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization · 2022Article
- Quantitative analysis of F-actin redistribution in astrocytoma cells treated with candidate pharmaceuticals.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2014Article
- Rapid analysis and exploration of fluorescence microscopy images.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- Light microscopy applications in systems biology: opportunities and challenges.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2013Article
- Automated protein subcellular localization based on local invariant features.The protein journal · 2013Article
- Article
- Active learning framework with iterative clustering for bioimage classification.Nature communications · 2012Article
- Quantifying the distribution of probes between subcellular locations using unsupervised pattern unmixing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Visualization of image data from cells to organisms.Nature methods · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAutomated microscopy technologies have led to a rapid growth in imaging data on a scale comparable to that of the genomic revolution. High throughput screens are now being performed to determine the localisation of all of proteins in a proteome. Closer to the bench, large image sets of proteins in treated and untreated cells are being captured on a daily basis to determine function and interactions. Hence there is a need for new methodologies and protocols to test for difference in subcellular imaging both to remove bias and enable throughput. Here we introduce a novel method of statistical testing, and supporting software, to give a rigorous test for difference in imaging. We also outline the key questions and steps in establishing an analysis pipeline.
resultsThe methodology is tested on a high throughput set of images of 10 subcellular localisations, and it is shown that the localisations may be distinguished to a statistically significant degree with as few as 12 images of each. Further, subtle changes in a protein's distribution between nocodazole treated and control experiments are shown to be detectable. The effect of outlier images is also examined and it is shown that while the significance of the test may be reduced by outliers this may be compensated for by utilising more images. Finally, the test is compared to previous work and shown to be more sensitive in detecting difference. The methodology has been implemented within the iCluster system for visualising and clustering bio-image sets.
conclusionThe aim here is to establish a methodology and protocol for testing for difference in subcellular imaging, and to provide tools to do so. While iCluster is applicable to moderate (<1000) size image sets, the statistical test is simple to implement and will readily be adapted to high throughput pipelines to provide more sensitive discrimination of difference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.