Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19302088›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2009

Ethanol-induced social facilitation in adolescent rats: role of endogenous activity at mu opioid receptors.

Elena I Varlinskaya, Linda P Spear

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The neurobiology of social play and its rewarding value in rats.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elena I VarlinskayaThe Department of Psychology, Center for Development and Behavioral Neuroscience, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA. varlinsk@binghamton.edu
Linda P Spear
Binghamton University · US

Funding

Ethanol and Social Interactions in Adoolescent RatsR01AA012453 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI VARLINSKAYA, ELENA I · 2002 to 2011
$2.6M
ADOLESCENT ALCOHOL ADAPTATION: TOLERANCE &STRESSR37AA012525 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, LINDA PATIA · 2000 to 2008
$2.5M
Ethanol-Induced Social Facilitation in Adolescence: Social and Ethanol RewardR01AA016887 · NIAAA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI SPEAR, LINDA PATIA · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA 012453NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012453NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA 016887NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016887NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA 012525NIAAA NIH HHS R37 AA012525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthanol consumption is considerably elevated during adolescence. Attractiveness of alcohol for humans during the adolescent developmental period is based, in part, on its ability to induce social facilitation--a facilitation of social interactions not only evident in human adolescents but also in adolescent rats. Endogenous opioid systems are among the multiple neural systems implicated in the behavioral and reinforcing effects of ethanol and may play a substantial role in modulating stimulatory effects of low doses of ethanol on social behavior during adolescence. This possibility was explored in the present study through the use of an animal model of peer-directed social behavior.

methodsSprague-Dawley rats were challenged early in adolescence with saline or ethanol intraperitoneally (i.p.), placed into an individual holding cage for 30 minutes, and then tested in a familiar situation with a nonmanipulated partner of the same age and sex. In Experiment 1, each test subject was injected subcutaneously with one of the three doses of a nonselective opioid antagonist naloxone (0, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg), 5 minutes prior to the social interaction test and 25 minutes following challenge with saline or ethanol (0.5 g/kg), whereas in Experiment 2 animals were challenged with one of the six doses of ethanol (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.25 g/kg) prior to injection of either saline or naloxone (0.05 mg/kg). In Experiment 3, animals were pretreated i.p. with the selective mu-opioid antagonist CTOP (0, 0.01, 0.025, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg) 30 minutes prior to challenge with saline or ethanol (0.5 g/kg).

resultsLow doses of ethanol (0.5 and 0.75 g/kg) produced social facilitation, as indexed by significant increases in play fighting and social investigation. Both doses of naloxone and the three highest doses of CTOP blocked the stimulatory effects of ethanol on play fighting but not on social investigation. These effects were not associated with alterations in ethanol pharmacokinetic properties or with shifts in the biphasic ethanol dose-response curve.

conclusionsEthanol-induced facilitation of social play behavior seen in adolescent animals is mediated in part through ethanol-induced release of endogenous ligands for the mu-opioid receptor or an ethanol-associated enhancement of sensitivity of these receptors for their endogenous ligands.

Indexed as

Social FacilitationAgingAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCentral Nervous System DepressantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFemaleInjections, IntraperitonealInjections, SubcutaneousLocomotionMaleModels, AnimalNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsRatsCentral Nervous System DepressantsEthanolNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsphenylalanyl-cyclo(cysteinyltyrosyl-tryptophyl-ornithyl-threonyl-penicillamine)threoninamideReceptors, Opioid, muSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID19302088
PMCPMC3045078
OpenAlexW1991045006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.