ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2010
Feasibility of MRI in experimentally induced inflammatory small bowel disease: a pilot study in a porcine model.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasound-Guided Microbubble-Mediated Locoregional Delivery of Multiple MicroRNAs Improves Chemotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Nanotheranostics · 2022Article
- Use of Translational, Genetically Modified Porcine Models to Ultimately Improve Intestinal Disease Treatment.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Review
- Sacral nerve stimulation enhances early intestinal mucosal repair following mucosal injury in a pig model.The Journal of physiology · 2016Article
- Quantitative Assessment of Inflammation in a Porcine Acute Terminal Ileitis Model: US with a Molecularly Targeted Contrast Agent.Radiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the macroscopic and microscopic findings of experimentally induced inflammatory lesions in jejunum and ileum with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. Inflammatory small bowel lesions were experimentally induced in six pigs. Bowel segments in jejunum and ileum were isolated, and a solution with trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid and ethanol (TNBS-EtOH) was installed. MRI of the small bowel was performed 7 days after surgery. Before the MRI examination, a 6% mannitol solution was installed through a nasogastric tube. The MRI protocol consisted of single-shot turbo spin echo T2 sequences, steady state free precession (BFFE) sequences, and a 3D T1 gradient echo sequence with fat saturation and intravenous contrast. The following image findings were evaluated: increased bowel wall thickness (BWT), increased bowel wall enhancement (BWE), and bowel stenosis. After the MRI examination, the animals were sacrificed. The small bowel was removed and examined macroscopically and microscopically. Inflammatory lesions developed in jejunum and ileum in all animals. The lesions were visible macroscopically and microscopically. The microscopic findings consisted of variable degrees of inflammation, ulcer formation, and fibrosis. In jejunum the inflammatory lesions were not diagnosed with MRI, except in one pig with a bowel necrosis probably caused by an intramural injection or leakage of the TNBS-EtOH solution. In ileum the bowel wall thickness was increased and the inflammatory lesions were diagnosed with MRI. In conclusion, the inflammatory lesions were visible macroscopically and microscopically. Lesions in ileum had increased BWT and were possible to image with MRI. Lesions in jejunum had normal BWT and were not diagnosed with MRI, except in one pig with increased BWT probably caused by complications to the installation of TNBS-EtOH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.