ReviewJournal of neurology2008
Monoclonal antibodies in the therapy of multiple sclerosis: an overview.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monoclonal antibodies in treatment of multiple sclerosis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2014Review
- Review
- Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: promises for diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2011Review
- Molecular regulation of JC virus tropism: insights into potential therapeutic targets for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2010Review
- The blood-brain barrier in neurodegenerative disease: a rhetorical perspective.Journal of neurochemistry · 2009Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the generation of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), a new therapeutical concept has gained importance. MAbs aim against selective antigens and so have changed our treatment strategies from non-specific to specific. Four therapeuticals have gained importance in the therapy of multiple sclerosis (MS): One has already been approved for therapy (natalizumab), whereas the other three are either in clinical trials or are about to enter phase III studies. Currently, two phase III studies that evaluate the efficacy of alemtuzumab have begun with recruitment (MS CARE I and II). Another mAb (daclizumab) under study is directed to the interleukin-2alpha chain (CD25). Results of clinical trials are promising by reporting reduction of relapses and progression in relapsing remitting and secondary progressive MS accompanied by reduction of new lesions in magnetic resonance imaging. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of daclizumab in MS is going to be initiated. Trials with a humanised antibody directed against the cell surface molecule CD20 are under development. Although the future will emphasise this trend to mAbs, the risks should not be ignored as has been shown in recent news. Still, mAbs have the possibility to revolutionise therapeutical concepts in the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, and will therefore be a useful addition to current therapeutic concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.