Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19300912›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2009

[Fast tracking in pediatric surgery].

S Holland-Cunz, P Günther

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S Holland-CunzChirurgische Klinik, Sektion Kinderchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, Heidelberg, Germany. stefan.holland-cunz@med.uni-heidelberg.de
P Günther

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast track protocols are justified for several pediatric surgical procedures. Particular operations on neonates and babies require specialized postoperative care. In these very young patients, no benefit can be expected from rigid fast track concepts. Many workflows in pediatric surgery have already been optimized with a view toward very short hospital stay. The published experiences with fast track protocols in pediatric surgery show that the method is feasible and safe. Complication and readmission rates are very low. Perioperative adjustments, shorter fasting periods, and the use of new analgetics are desirable in pediatric fast track protocols. Particularly for children, customizing protocols to the individual patients' requirements must be guaranteed.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresLength of StayMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresAdolescentAnalgesiaAppendectomyChildChild, PreschoolCost SavingsGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLaparoscopyPatient Care TeamPatient Readmission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.