ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Directing experimental biology: a case study in mitochondrial biogenesis.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting co-expression-based automated function prediction in yeast with neural networks and updated Gene Ontology annotations.PloS one · 2026Article
- varCADD: large sets of standing genetic variation enable genome-wide pathogenicity prediction.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens.Genome biology · 2019Article
- NewG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
- REFINING CELLULAR PATHWAY MODELS USING AN ENSEMBLE OF HETEROGENEOUS DATA SOURCES.The annals of applied statistics · 2018Article
- Recent Advances and Emerging Applications in Text and Data Mining for Biomedical Discovery.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2016Review
- Understanding multicellular function and disease with human tissue-specific networks.Nature genetics · 2015Article
- Testing multiple hypotheses through IMP weighted FDR based on a genetic functional network with application to a new zebrafish transcriptome study.BioData mining · 2015Article
- Novel insights into embryonic stem cell self-renewal revealed through comparative human and mouse systems biology networks.Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) · 2014Article
- Spatial and functional organization of mitochondrial protein network.Scientific reports · 2013Article
- Cell-type-specific predictive network yields novel insights into mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and cell fate.PloS one · 2013Article
- Discovery of cellular proteins required for the early steps of HCV infection using integrative genomics.PloS one · 2013Article
- Genome-wide matching of genes to cellular roles using guilt-by-association models derived from single sample analysis.BMC research notes · 2012Article
- Accurate evaluation and analysis of functional genomics data and methods.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2012Article
- Chapter 2: Data-driven view of disease biology.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Tissue-specific functional networks for prioritizing phenotype and disease genes.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- A parallel algorithm for reverse engineering of biological networks.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2011Article
- Yeast: an experimental organism for 21st Century biology.Genetics · 2011Review
- PILGRM: an interactive data-driven discovery platform for expert biologists.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Network clustering revealed the systemic alterations of mitochondrial protein expression.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational approaches have promised to organize collections of functional genomics data into testable predictions of gene and protein involvement in biological processes and pathways. However, few such predictions have been experimentally validated on a large scale, leaving many bioinformatic methods unproven and underutilized in the biology community. Further, it remains unclear what biological concerns should be taken into account when using computational methods to drive real-world experimental efforts. To investigate these concerns and to establish the utility of computational predictions of gene function, we experimentally tested hundreds of predictions generated from an ensemble of three complementary methods for the process of mitochondrial organization and biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The biological data with respect to the mitochondria are presented in a companion manuscript published in PLoS Genetics (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000407). Here we analyze and explore the results of this study that are broadly applicable for computationalists applying gene function prediction techniques, including a new experimental comparison with 48 genes representing the genomic background. Our study leads to several conclusions that are important to consider when driving laboratory investigations using computational prediction approaches. While most genes in yeast are already known to participate in at least one biological process, we confirm that genes with known functions can still be strong candidates for annotation of additional gene functions. We find that different analysis techniques and different underlying data can both greatly affect the types of functional predictions produced by computational methods. This diversity allows an ensemble of techniques to substantially broaden the biological scope and breadth of predictions. We also find that performing prediction and validation steps iteratively allows us to more completely characterize a biological area of interest. While this study focused on a specific functional area in yeast, many of these observations may be useful in the contexts of other processes and organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.