ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Using network component analysis to dissect regulatory networks mediated by transcription factors in yeast.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Identifying potential survival strategies of HIV-1 through virus-host protein interaction networks.BMC systems biology · 2010Pooled it
- Hierarchical graphical model reveals HFR1 bridging circadian rhythm and flower development inNPJ systems biology and applications · 2019Article
- Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications.GigaScience · 2018Review
- TIGERi: modeling and visualizing the responses to perturbation of a transcription factor network.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Reconstruction of temporal activity of microRNAs from gene expression data in breast cancer cell line.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- On predicting regulatory genes by analysis of functional networks in C. elegans.BioData mining · 2015Article
- Harnessing natural sequence variation to dissect posttranscriptional regulatory networks in yeast.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2014Article
- Modeling the transcriptional regulatory network that controls the early hypoxic response in Candida albicans.Eukaryotic cell · 2014Article
- Learning gene networks under SNP perturbations using eQTL datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Gene Ontology annotation of sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factors: setting the stage for a large-scale curation effort.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2013Article
- From genotype to phenotype: can systems biology be used to predict Staphylococcus aureus virulence?Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2012Review
- Article
- Advantages and limitations of current network inference methods.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2010Review
- Identifying the genetic determinants of transcription factor activity.Molecular systems biology · 2010Article
- Linking variants from genome-wide association analysis to function via transcriptional network analysis.Seminars in nephrology · 2010Review
- Toward the dynamic interactome: it's about time.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2010Review
- Correlating gene expression variation with cis-regulatory polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Genome biology and evolution · 2010Article
- Understanding gene sequence variation in the context of transcription regulation in yeast.PLoS genetics · 2010Article
- Legume transcription factor genes: what makes legumes so special?Plant physiology · 2009Review
- Transcriptional regulatory circuits: predicting numbers from alphabets.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between genetic variation and gene expression is a central question in genetics. With the availability of data from high-throughput technologies such as ChIP-Chip, expression, and genotyping arrays, we can begin to not only identify associations but to understand how genetic variations perturb the underlying transcription regulatory networks to induce differential gene expression. In this study, we describe a simple model of transcription regulation where the expression of a gene is completely characterized by two properties: the concentrations and promoter affinities of active transcription factors. We devise a method that extends Network Component Analysis (NCA) to determine how genetic variations in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) perturb these two properties. Applying our method to a segregating population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we found statistically significant examples of trans-acting SNPs located in regulatory hotspots that perturb transcription factor concentrations and affinities for target promoters to cause global differential expression and cis-acting genetic variations that perturb the promoter affinities of transcription factors on a single gene to cause local differential expression. Although many genetic variations linked to gene expressions have been identified, it is not clear how they perturb the underlying regulatory networks that govern gene expression. Our work begins to fill this void by showing that many genetic variations affect the concentrations of active transcription factors in a cell and their affinities for target promoters. Understanding the effects of these perturbations can help us to paint a more complete picture of the complex landscape of transcription regulation. The software package implementing the algorithms discussed in this work is available as a MATLAB package upon request.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.