Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19300445›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2009

Transient cell-cell interactions in neural circuit formation.

Daniel L Chao, Le Ma, Kang Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microglia regulate chandelier cell axo-axonic synaptogenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Caged Cumate Enables Proximity-Dependent Control Over Gene Expression.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Perineuronal Nets and Their Role in Synaptic Homeostasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel L ChaoNeurosciences Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Le Ma
Kang Shen

Funding

Mechanisms of Synaptic Specificity in C. elegansR01NS048392 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, KANG · 2005 to 2014
$3.1M
Mechanisms of synaptic specificity in C. elegansR37NS048392 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHEN, KANG · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048392NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS048392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wiring of the nervous system requires a complex orchestration of developmental events. Emerging evidence suggests that transient cell-cell interactions often serve as positional cues for axon guidance and synaptogenesis during the assembly of neural circuits. In contrast to the relatively stable cellular interactions between synaptic partners in mature circuits, these transient interactions involve cells that are not destined to be pre- or postsynaptic cells. Here we review the roles of these transient cell-cell interactions in a variety of developmental contexts and describe the mechanisms through which they organize neural connections.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell MovementHumansModels, NeurologicalNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNeurons

Identifiers

PMID19300445
PMCPMC3083859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.