Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19299580›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2009

Endothelin antagonism in portal hypertensive mice: implications for endothelin receptor-specific signaling in liver disease.

Hong-Qiang Feng, Nate D Weymouth, Don C Rockey

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Endothelin-1 in portal hypertension: The intricate role of hepatic stellate cells.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Treatment Barriers in Portopulmonary Hypertension.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2019
    Review
  17. Biology of portal hypertension.Hepatology international · 2018
    Review
  18. Advances in therapeutic options for portal hypertension.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Hepatic and Plasma Endothelin-1 in Dogs with Chronic Hepatitis.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hong-Qiang FengDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-8887, USA.
Nate D Weymouth
Don C Rockey
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK 50344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent vasoactive peptide, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of liver disease and portal hypertension. Two major endothelin receptors (ET-A and ET-B) mediate biological effects, largely on the basis of their known downstream signaling pathways. We hypothesized that the different receptors are likely to mediate divergent effects in portal hypertensive mice. Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis and portal hypertension were induced in 8-wk-old male BALB/c mice by gavage with carbon tetrachloride (CCl4). Portal pressure was recorded acutely during intravenous infusion of endothelin receptor antagonists in normal or portal hypertensive mice. In vivo microscopy was used to monitor sinusoidal dynamics. Additionally, the effect of chronic exposure to endothelin antagonists was assessed in mice during induction of fibrosis and cirrhosis with CCl4 for 8 wk. Intravenous infusion of ET-A receptor antagonists into normal and cirrhotic mice reduced portal pressure whereas ET-B receptor antagonism increased portal pressure. A mixed endothelin receptor antagonist also significantly reduced portal pressure. Additionally, the ET-A receptor antagonist caused sinusoidal dilation, whereas the ET-B receptor antagonist caused sinusoidal constriction. Chronic administration of each the endothelin receptor antagonists during the induction of fibrosis and portal hypertension led to reduced fibrosis, a significant reduction in portal pressure, and altered sinusoidal dynamics relative to controls. Acute effects of endothelin receptor antagonists are likely directly on the hepatic and sinusoidal vasculature, whereas chronic endothelin receptor antagonism appears to be more complicated, likely affecting fibrogenesis and the hepatic microcirculation. The data imply a relationship between hepatic fibrogenesis or fibrosis and vasomotor responses.

Indexed as

Endothelin A Receptor AntagonistsEndothelin B Receptor AntagonistsAnimalsAtrasentanEndothelinsHypertension, PortalInfusions, IntravenousLiverLiver CirculationLiver Cirrhosis, ExperimentalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPortal PressurePyrrolidinesReceptor, Endothelin AA 182086A 192621AtrasentanEndothelin A Receptor AntagonistsEndothelin B Receptor AntagonistsEndothelinsPyrrolidinesReceptor, Endothelin AReceptor, Endothelin BSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID19299580
PMCPMC2711758
OpenAlexW2124900123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.