Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19299563›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmacology2009

Ligand selectivity and gene regulation by the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor in transgenic mice.

Colin A Flaveny, Iain A Murray, Chris R Chiaro, Gary H Perdew

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. AHR in the intestinal microenvironment: safeguarding barrier function.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Colin A FlavenyCenter for Molecular Toxicology and Carcinogenesis and the Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, the Pennsylvania State University, 16802, USA.
Iain A Murray
Chris R Chiaro
Gary H Perdew
Pennsylvania State University · USCancer Institute (WIA) · IN

Funding

REGULATION OF THE AH RECEPTORR01ES004869 · NIEHS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI PERDEW, GARY H. · 1994 to 2017
$5.3M
RENOVATION OF AN ANIMAL CARE FACILITYC06RR014520 · NCRR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI PELL, EVA J · 2000 to 2000
$1.0M
BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE AH RECEPTORR29ES004869 · NIEHS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI PERDEW, GARY H · 1989 to 1993
–
NCRR NIH HHS 1C06-RR14520NIEHS NIH HHS ES04869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that displays interspecies differences with the human and mouse AHR C-terminal region sequences sharing only 58% amino acid sequence identity. Compared with the mouse AHR (mAHR), the human AHR (hAHR) displays approximately 10-fold lower relative affinity for prototypical AHR ligands such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, which has been attributed to the amino acid residue valine 381 (alanine 375 in the mAHR) in the ligand binding domain of the hAHR. We investigated whether the 10-fold difference in ligand-binding affinity between the mAHR and hAHR would be observed with a diverse range of AHR ligands. To test this hypothesis, ligand binding assays were performed using the photo-affinity ligand 2-azido-3-[(125)I]iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-p-dioxin and liver cytosol isolated from hepatocyte-specific transgenic hAHR mice and C57BL/6J mice. It is noteworthy that competitive ligand-binding assays revealed that, compared with the mAHR, the hAHR has a higher relative affinity for certain compounds, including indirubin [(2Z)-2,3-biindole-2,3 (1'H,1'H)-dione and quercetin (2-(3,4dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one]. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed that indirubin was more efficient at transforming the hAHR compared with the mAHR. Indirubin was also a more potent inducer of Cyp1a1 expression in transgenic hAHR mouse hepatocytes compared with C57BL/6J mouse hepatocytes. These observations suggest that indirubin is a potent hAHR ligand that is able to selectively bind to and activate the hAHR. These discoveries imply that there may be a significant degree of structural divergence between mAHR and hAHR ligands and highlights the importance of the hAHR transgenic mouse as a model to study the hAHR in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzimidazolesBinding, CompetitiveChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DioxinsGene Expression RegulationHepatocytesHumansIndolesIn Vitro TechniquesIodine RadioisotopesLigandsMiceMice, Inbred C57BL2-iodo-7,8-dibromodibenzo-1,4-dioxinBenzimidazolesCytochrome P-450 CYP1A1DioxinsindirubinIndolesIodine RadioisotopesLigandsM50354Photoaffinity LabelsQuercetinReceptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon

Identifiers

PMID19299563
PMCPMC2684888
OpenAlexW2136650702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.