ReviewBrain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland)2010
Array-based genomics in glioma research.
Review in Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical implementation of integrated whole-genome copy number and mutation profiling for glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2015Article
- Spatial and temporal evolution of distal 10q deletion, a prognostically unfavorable event in diffuse low-grade gliomas.Genome biology · 2014Article
- Identification of a novel population in high-grade oligodendroglial tumors not deleted on 1p/19q using array CGH.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2012Article
- DNA fragmentation simulation method (FSM) and fragment size matching improve aCGH performance of FFPE tissues.PloS one · 2012Article
- Genomic changes in gliomas detected using single nucleotide polymorphism array in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue: superior results compared with microsatellite analysis.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2011Article
- A new alternative mechanism in glioblastoma vascularization: tubular vasculogenic mimicry.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the years, several relevant biomarkers with a potential clinical interest have been identified in gliomas using various techniques, such as karyotype, microsatellite analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization and chromosome comparative genomic hybridization. Despite their pivotal contribution to our understanding of gliomas biology, clinical application of these approaches has been limited by technological and clinical complexities. In contrast, genomic arrays (array-based comparative genomic hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphisms array) have emerged as promising technologies for clinical use in the setting of gliomas. Indeed, their feasibility and reliability have been rigorously assessed in gliomas and are discussed in this review. The well-known genomic biomarkers in gliomas are in fact readily and reliably identified using genomic arrays. Moreover, it detects a multitude of new cryptic genomic markers, with potential biological and/or clinical significances. The main studies dedicated to genomic characterization of gliomas using genomic arrays are reviewed here. Interestingly, several recurrent genomic signatures have been reported by different teams, suggesting the validity of these genomic patterns. In light of this, genomic arrays are relatively simple and cost-effective techniques whose implementation in molecular diagnostic laboratories should be encouraged as a valuable clinical tool for management of glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.