Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19298319›Full record

Trial reportAddiction biology2009

Do genetic and individual risk factors moderate the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy? Drinking outcomes with an emerging adult sample.

Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Heather A LaChance, Angela Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. A pilot trial of a brief intervention for cannabis use supplemented with a substance-free activity session or relaxation training.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Trial
  8. Motivational interviewing plus behavioral activation for alcohol misuse in college students with ADHD.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2015
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2009
    Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah W Feldstein EwingThe University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. sfeldstein@mrn.org
Heather A LaChance
Angela Bryan
Kent E Hutchison
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

STARTLE REFLEX--TESTING ALCOHOL PATIENTS AND TREATMENTSR01AA012238 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI HUTCHISON, KENT E. · 2000 to 2014
$5.6M
New Pharmacotherapy for Alcohol Dependence: OlanzapineR01AA014886 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HUTCHISON, KENT E. · 2006 to 2010
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012238NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014886NIAAA NIH HHS (R01 AA 11473-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research indicates that motivational enhancement therapy (MET) helps catalyze reductions in problem drinking among emerging adults. However, moderators of this intervention remain relatively unknown. Therefore, the objectives of this study were: (1) to test whether a single session of MET increased motivation to reduce drinking and drinking outcomes; and (2) to examine whether genetic dopamine D(4) receptor L (DRD4 L) and individual personality risk factors (impulsivity and novelty seeking) moderated the effects of the MET. These hypotheses were evaluated by randomly assigning a sample of emerging adult problem drinkers (n = 67) to receive a single session of MET or alcohol education. Follow-up data indicated that only individuals who were low in impulsivity, novelty seeking and/or who had the short DRD4 variable number of tandem repeats genotype evidenced differentially increased behavior change (taking steps toward reducing drinking) following the MET.

Indexed as

GenotypeMotivationAdultAlcoholismExploratory BehaviorFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorIndividualityMalePatient Education as TopicPersonality InventoryPsychotherapy, BriefReceptors, Dopamine D4Risk FactorsTemperanceDRD4 protein, humanReceptors, Dopamine D4

Identifiers

PMID19298319
PMCPMC2913542
OpenAlexW2078752630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.