Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19297625›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Endometrium as an early sensor of in vitro embryo manipulation technologies.

Nadéra Mansouri-Attia, Olivier Sandra, Julie Aubert, Séverine Degrelle, Robin E Everts, Corinne Giraud-Delville, Yvan Heyman, Laurent Galio, Isabelle Hue, Xiangzhong Yang and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 242 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bovine Endometrium Drives and Responds to Divergence of In Vitro Produced Conceptus Biochemistry.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadéra Mansouri-AttiaInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1198 Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Olivier Sandra
Julie Aubert
Séverine Degrelle
Robin E Everts
Corinne Giraud-Delville
Yvan Heyman
Laurent Galio
Isabelle Hue
Xiangzhong Yang
X Cindy Tian
Harris A Lewin
Jean-Paul Renard
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRCenter for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USAgroParisTech · FRDépartement Génétique Animale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantation is crucial for placental development that will subsequently impact fetal growth and pregnancy success with consequences on postnatal health. We postulated that the pattern of genes expressed by the endometrium when the embryo becomes attached to the mother uterus could account for the final outcome of a pregnancy. As a model, we used the bovine species where the embryo becomes progressively and permanently attached to the endometrium from day 20 of gestation onwards. At that stage, we compared the endometrial genes profiles in the presence of an in vivo fertilized embryo (AI) with the endometrial patterns obtained in the presence of nuclear transfer (SCNT) or in vitro fertilized embryos (IVF), both displaying lower and different potentials for term development. Our data provide evidence that the endometrium can be considered as a biological sensor able to fine-tune its physiology in response to the presence of embryos whose development will become altered much later after the implantation process. Compared with AI, numerous biological functions and several canonical pathways with a major impact on metabolism and immune function were found to be significantly altered in the endometrium of SCNT pregnancies at implantation, whereas the differences were less pronounced with IVF embryos. Determining the limits of the endometrial plasticity at the onset of implantation should bring new insights on the contribution of the maternal environment to the development of an embryo and the success of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalNuclear Transfer TechniquesAnimalsCattleEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo, MammalianEmbryonic DevelopmentEndometriumFemaleFertilizationPregnancyPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19297625
PMCPMC2667091
OpenAlexW1973557693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.