Trial reportEuropean heart journal2009
Socioeconomic status, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension in a prospective cohort of female health professionals.
Trial report in European heart journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparities in Socioeconomic Context and Association With Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Outcomes in ALLHAT.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Trial
- Quantile regression analysis of modifiable and non-modifiable drivers' of blood pressure among urban and rural women in Ghana.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- A pilot study to evaluate learning style-tailored information prescriptions for hypertensive emergency department patients.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2011Trial
- Relationship between socioeconomic status and hypertension incidence among adults in southwest China: a population-based cohort study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- The Role of Supplementary Insurance in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Comprehensive Review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Review
- Examining the Role of Psychosocial Stressors in Hypertension.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2022Article
- Social determinants of hypertension in high-income countries: A narrative literature review and future directions.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022Review
- Data Mining-Based Analysis of Modern Chinese Medicine for the Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris in Coronary Heart Disease.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Prevalence and Socioeconomic Factors of Diabetes and High Blood Pressure Among Women in Kenya: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2021Article
- Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Associations of tea consumption with blood pressure progression and hypertension incidence.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2021Article
- Article
- Prevalence, Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complications of Hypertension Postliving Kidney Donation.BioMed research international · 2021Review
- The 'Heart Kuznets Curve'? Understanding the relations between economic development and cardiac conditions.World development · 2020Article
- Influence of height on blood pressure and hypertension among Bangladeshi adults.International Journal of Cardiology. Hypertension · 2020Article
- Association between cumulative social risk, particulate matter environmental pollutant exposure, and cardiovascular disease risk.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- Article
- Relationship of Time-Activity-Adjusted Particle Number Concentration with Blood Pressure.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Late life socioeconomic status and hypertension in an aging cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.Journal of hypertension · 2018Article
- Urban and rural differences in hypertension risk factors in Turkey.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to examine the association between socioeconomic status, blood pressure (BP) progression, and incident hypertension. METHODS AND
resultsWe included 27 207 female health professionals free of hypertension and cardiovascular disease at baseline. Participants were classified into five education and six income categories. The main outcome variables were BP progression at 48 months of follow-up and incident hypertension during the entire study period. At 48 months, 48.1% of women had BP progression. The multivariable adjusted relative risks [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for BP progression were 1.0 (referent), 0.96 (0.92-1.00), 0.92 (0.88-0.96), 0.90 (0.85-0.94), and 0.84 (0.78-0.91) (P for trend <0.0001) across increasing education categories and 1.0 (referent), 1.01 (0.94-1.08), 0.99 (0.93-1.06), 0.97 (0.91-1.04), 0.96 (0.90-1.03), and 0.89 (0.83-0.96) across increasing income categories (P for trend = 0.0001). During a median follow-up of 9.8 years, 8248 cases of incident hypertension occurred. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 1.0 (referent), 0.92 (0.86-0.99), 0.85 (0.79-0.92), 0.87 (0.80-0.94), and 0.74 (0.65-0.84) (P for trend <0.0001) across increasing education categories and 1.0 (referent), 1.07 (0.95-1.21), 1.07 (0.95-1.20), 1.06 (0.94-1.18), 1.04 (0.93-1.16), and 0.93 (0.82-1.06) (P for trend 0.08) across increasing income categories. In joint analyses, education but not income remained associated with BP progression and incident hypertension.
conclusionSocioeconomic status, as determined by education but not by income, is a strong independent predictor of BP progression and incident hypertension in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.