Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19296723›Full record

ReviewPLoS biology2009

The implications of multiple circadian clock origins.

Michael Rosbash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Circadian rhythms: pervasive, and often times evasive.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. PERspectives on circadian cell biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Seasonal plasticity in daily timing of flight activity inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Liver as a nexus of daily metabolic cross talk.International review of cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Nuclear receptor protein: REV-ERB.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael RosbashHoward Hughes Medical Institute, National Center for Behavioral Genomics, and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA. rosbash@brandeis.edu

Funding

THE MOLECULAR GENETIC BASIS OF SENSORY BEHAVIOR IN DROSOPHILAP01NS044232 · NINDS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GARRITY, PAUL · 2002 to 2011
$13.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNINDS NIH HHS P01 NS044232NINDS NIH HHS P01-NS044232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Eukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBiological ClocksCircadian RhythmCyanobacteriaDrosophilaHumans

Identifiers

PMID19296723
PMCPMC2656552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.