ArticleInternational journal of hematology2009
A retrospective analysis of bortezomib therapy for Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: beta2-microglobulin associated with time to progression.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic impact of resistance to bortezomib and/or lenalidomide in carfilzomib-based therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: The Kyoto Clinical Hematology Study Group, multicenter, pilot, prospective, observational study in Asian patients.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Observational
- Looking back to move forward: a twenty-year audit of herpes zoster in Asia-Pacific.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Review
- Bortezomib and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: higher AST and LDH levels associated with a worse prognosis on overall survival.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- The choice of regimens based on bortezomib for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.PloS one · 2014Article
- Bortezomib plus dexamethasone for relapsed or treatment refractory multiple myeloma: the collaborative study at six institutes in Kyoto and Osaka.International journal of hematology · 2010Article
- The risk factors for herpes zoster in bortezomib treatment in patients with multiple myeloma.The Korean journal of hematology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bortezomib is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), but only a few clinical studies for Japanese patients who were treated with bortezomib have been reported. We retrospectively analyzed 40 patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received bortezomib at three collaborating centers in Miyagi prefecture in Japan. All the patients have been received bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone. Responses were determined using International Myeloma Working Group uniform response criteria. The overall response was observed in 30 patients (75%), including very good partial response in 8 patients (20%), and partial response in 22 patients (55%). The median time to disease progression was 8.7 months, and the median overall survival has not been reached. The factors affecting time to disease progression were International Staging System stage, serum beta2-microglobulin level, and number of treatment cycles. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (50%), peripheral neuropathy (25%), leukopenia (25%), and herpes zoster infection (25%). Thus, bortezomib is well tolerated and effective for Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory MM. Our results suggest that serum beta2-microglobulin level may be a marker of prognosis on bortezomib therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory MM although further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19296199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.