ReviewDer Orthopade2009
[Bisphosphonates for malignant bone tumors].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are able to prevent, reduce, or delay skeletal complications caused by tumors. Since the introduction of BPs, there has been a marked reduction of skeletal events. Today we can choose from a variety of BPs with different potency, efficacy, dosing, and administration regimens, as well as BPs for different indications. For patients with tumors who have a risk of developing osteoporosis induced by the tumor or antitumor treatment, we should think of prevention. In general, BPs are well tolerated. But there are also side effects: flulike syndrome, arthralgias, or, when administered orally, gastrointestinal symptoms. In a number of cases, the dosing regime must be adjusted according to renal function and baseline creatinine clearance. This paper reviews the current evidence-based use of BPs in solid tumors and the recommendations for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.