Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19295511›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2009

Will the Kraepelinian dichotomy survive DSM-V?

Bernard A Fischer, William T Carpenter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Psychosis and fever revisited.Schizophrenia research · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Classical Schizophrenia: Liddle and the Core of Schizophrenia.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. NeuroImage. Clinical · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bernard A FischerDepartment of Psychiatry, Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, VA Capitol Health Care Network (VISN 5) MIRECC & University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21228, USA.
William T Carpenter

Funding

Tretment of negative symptoms and cognitive impairment in schizopreniaP50MH082999 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARPENTER, WILLIAM T. · 2008 to 2012
$9.7M
Multidisciplinary Schizophrenia Research TrainingT32MH067533 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARPENTER, WILLIAM T., ELMER, GREGORY I · 2004 to 2025
$4.3M
NIMH NIH HHS 1P50 MH082999NIMH NIH HHS 5T32 MH67533NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH082999NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH067533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kraepelin proposed dementia praecox and manic-depressive illness as the two major psychotic disorders. This paradigm is still prevalent, but observations of overlapping boundaries between bipolar disorder and schizophrenia challenge this dichotomy. However, the concept of schizophrenia has been radically altered from the original Kraepelinian proposal. We defend the two psychoses positions, but suggest two flaws in the heuristic application: (1) overlapping features, such as psychotic symptoms, are not decisive in differential diagnosis; and (2) each disorder is a syndrome, not a disease entity. An alternative paradigm based on domains of pathology is more powerful for studies of etiology, pathophysiology, and therapeutic discovery.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersBipolar DisorderDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansSchizophreniaSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID19295511
PMCPMC2721021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.