Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19295307›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2009

Comparison of transplantation of adipose tissue- and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the infarcted heart.

Koen E A van der Bogt, Sonja Schrepfer, Jin Yu, Ahmad Y Sheikh, Grant Hoyt, Johannes A Govaert, Jeffrey B Velotta, Christopher H Contag, Robert C Robbins, Joseph C Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanoparticles and clinically applicable cell tracking.The British journal of radiology · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Koen E A van der BogtDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5324, USA.
Sonja Schrepfer
Jin Yu
Ahmad Y Sheikh
Grant Hoyt
Johannes A Govaert
Jeffrey B Velotta
Christopher H Contag
Robert C Robbins
Joseph C Wu
Stanford University · USLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Cell TransplantationK08HL074883 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2005 to 2008
$531k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL074883NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL074883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMesenchymal stem cells hold promise for cardiovascular regenerative therapy. Derivation of these cells from the adipose tissue might be easier compared with bone marrow. However, the in vivo fate and function of adipose stromal cells (ASC) in the infarcted heart has never been compared directly to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells (MSC).

methodsASC and MSC were isolated from transgenic FVB mice with a beta-actin promoter driving firefly luciferase and green fluorescent protein double fusion reporter gene, and they were characterized using flow cytometry, microscopy, bioluminescence imaging and luminometry. FVB mice (n=8 per group) underwent myocardial infarction followed by intramyocardial injection of 5x10(5) ASC, MSC, fibroblasts (Fibro, positive control), or saline (negative control). Cell survival was measured using bioluminescence imaging for 6 weeks and cardiac function was monitored by echocardiography and pressure-volume analysis. Ventricular morphology was assessed using histology.

resultsASC and MSC were CD34(-), CD45(-), c-Kit(-), CD90(+), Sca-1(+), shared similar morphology and had a population doubling time of approximately 2 days. Cells expressed Fluc reporter genes in a number-dependent fashion as confirmed by luminometry. After cardiac transplantation, both cell types showed drastic donor cell death within 4 to 5 weeks. Furthermore, transplantation of either cell type was not capable of preserving ventricular function and dimensions, as confirmed by pressure-volume-loops and histology.

conclusionThis is the first study comparing the in vivo behavior of both cell types in the infarcted heart. ASC and MSC do not tolerate well in the cardiac environment, resulting in acute donor cell death and a subsequent loss of cardiac function similar to control groups.

Indexed as

ActinsAdipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow TransplantationCell DeathCell DivisionDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyFemaleFlow CytometryGenes, ReporterMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiceMice, Inbred StrainsMice, TransgenicActins

Identifiers

PMID19295307
PMCPMC2866004
OpenAlexW1984033663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.