ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Alignment and prediction of cis-regulatory modules based on a probabilistic model of evolution.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring fungal cis-regulatory networks from genome sequences via unsupervised and interpretable representation learning.Genetics · 2026Article
- Ancestral sequence reconstruction - An underused approach to understand the evolution of gene function in plants?Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Most of the tight positional conservation of transcription factor binding sites near the transcription start site reflects their co-localization within regulatory modules.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Identification of Lineage-Specific Cis-Regulatory Modules Associated with Variation in Transcription Factor Binding and Chromatin Activity Using Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Models.Molecular biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Article
- Tracing the evolution of lineage-specific transcription factor binding sites in a birth-death framework.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Simulations of enhancer evolution provide mechanistic insights into gene regulation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Computational identification of active enhancers in model organisms.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2013Review
- Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.BMC genomics · 2012Article
- Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2011Review
- Validation of skeletal muscle cis-regulatory module predictions reveals nucleotide composition bias in functional enhancers.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Consequences of eukaryotic enhancer architecture for gene expression dynamics, development, and fitness.PLoS genetics · 2011Article
- Evolutionary divergence and limits of conserved non-coding sequence detection in plant genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Genome-wide identification of conserved regulatory function in diverged sequences.Genome research · 2011Article
- Towards an evolutionary model of transcription networks.PLoS computational biology · 2011Article
- Evolution of gene regulation of pluripotency--the case for wiki tracks at genome browsers.Biology direct · 2010Article
- Modeling the evolution of regulatory elements by simultaneous detection and alignment with phylogenetic pair HMMs.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- Assessing computational methods of cis-regulatory module prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2010Article
- Origin and evolution of a placental-specific microRNA family in the human genome.BMC evolutionary biology · 2010Article
- Towards realistic benchmarks for multiple alignments of non-coding sequences.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-species comparison has emerged as a powerful paradigm for predicting cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) and understanding their evolution. The comparison requires reliable sequence alignment, which remains a challenging task for less conserved noncoding sequences. Furthermore, the existing models of DNA sequence evolution generally do not explicitly treat the special properties of CRM sequences. To address these limitations, we propose a model of CRM evolution that captures different modes of evolution of functional transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) and the background sequences. A particularly novel aspect of our work is a probabilistic model of gains and losses of TFBSs, a process being recognized as an important part of regulatory sequence evolution. We present a computational framework that uses this model to solve the problems of CRM alignment and prediction. Our alignment method is similar to existing methods of statistical alignment but uses the conserved binding sites to improve alignment. Our CRM prediction method deals with the inherent uncertainties of binding site annotations and sequence alignment in a probabilistic framework. In simulated as well as real data, we demonstrate that our program is able to improve both alignment and prediction of CRM sequences over several state-of-the-art methods. Finally, we used alignments produced by our program to study binding site conservation in genome-wide binding data of key transcription factors in the Drosophila blastoderm, with two intriguing results: (i) the factor-bound sequences are under strong evolutionary constraints even if their neighboring genes are not expressed in the blastoderm and (ii) binding sites in distal bound sequences (relative to transcription start sites) tend to be more conserved than those in proximal regions. Our approach is implemented as software, EMMA (Evolutionary Model-based cis-regulatory Module Analysis), ready to be applied in a broad biological context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.