Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19293944›Full record

ArticlePloS one2008

Multivalent HA DNA vaccination protects against highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza infection in chickens and mice.

Srinivas Rao, Wing-Pui Kong, Chih-Jen Wei, Zhi-Yong Yang, Martha Nason, Darrel Styles, Louis J DeTolla, Aruna Panda, Erin M Sorrell, Haichen Song and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A Review of DNA Vaccines Against Influenza.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DNA Vaccination in Chickens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  10. Prospects of HA-based universal influenza vaccine.BioMed research international · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Skin immunization with influenza vaccines.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2015
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Panda, Aruna [added]
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Srinivas RaoVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Wing-Pui Kong
Chih-Jen Wei
Zhi-Yong Yang
Martha Nason
Darrel Styles
Louis J DeTolla
Aruna Panda
Erin M Sorrell
Haichen Song
Hongquan Wan
Gloria C Ramirez-Nieto
Daniel Perez
Gary J Nabel
University of Maryland, College Park · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustained outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in avian species increase the risk of reassortment and adaptation to humans. The ability to contain its spread in chickens would reduce this threat and help maintain the capacity for egg-based vaccine production. While vaccines offer the potential to control avian disease, a major concern of current vaccines is their potency and inability to protect against evolving avian influenza viruses. METHODOLOGY / PRINCIPAL

findingsThe ability of DNA vaccines encoding hemagglutinin (HA) proteins from different HPAI H5N1 serotypes was evaluated for its ability to elicit neutralizing antibodies and to protect against homologous and heterologous HPAI H5N1 strain challenge in mice and chickens after DNA immunization by needle and syringe or with a pressure injection device. These vaccines elicited antibodies that neutralized multiple strains of HPAI H5N1 when given in combinations containing up to 10 HAs. The response was dose-dependent, and breadth was determined by the choice of the influenza virus HA in the vaccine. Monovalent and trivalent HA vaccines were tested first in mice and conferred protection against lethal H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 challenge 68 weeks after vaccination. In chickens, protection was observed against heterologous strains of HPAI H5N1 after vaccination with a trivalent H5 serotype DNA vaccine with doses as low as 5 microg DNA given twice either by intramuscular needle injection or with a needle-free device. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: DNA vaccines offer a generic approach to influenza virus immunization applicable to multiple animal species. In addition, the ability to substitute plasmids encoding different strains enables rapid adaptation of the vaccine to newly evolving field isolates.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensHemagglutininsInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesMiceTreatment OutcomeVaccines, DNAHemagglutininsInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19293944
PMCPMC2657001
OpenAlexW2031175131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.