ArticleThe American journal of gastroenterology2009
Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.
Article in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: A systematic review and meta-analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMTrial
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Understanding the iFOBT-to-Colonoscopy Gap.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Review
- Lack of Adherence to Guidelines on Follow-Up Colonoscopy after an Abnormal Stool Occult Blood Test.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2024Article
- Trends in colorectal cancer screening compliance and incidence among 60- to 74-year-olds in China.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Paying Attention to Miss(ed) FITs.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Article
- Bridging the Gap: Patient Navigation Increases Colonoscopy Follow-up After Abnormal FIT.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Factors affecting the follow-up time after a positive result in the fecal occult blood test.PloS one · 2021Article
- Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Measures to Improve Diagnostic Safety in Clinical Practice.Journal of patient safety · 2019Article
- Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type.American journal of preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Repeated Automated Mobile Text Messaging Reminders for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Strategies to Improve Follow-up After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Tests in a Community-Based Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2019Article
- The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.Journal of community health · 2017Article
- Article
- Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesInadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal occult blood test (FOBT) results occurs in several types of practice settings. Our institution implemented multifaceted quality improvement (QI) activities in 2004-2005 to improve follow-up of FOBT-positive results. Activities addressed precolonoscopy referral processes and system-level factors such as electronic communication, provider education, and feedback. We evaluated their effects on timeliness and appropriateness of positive-FOBT follow-up and identified factors that affect colonoscopy performance.
methodsRetrospective electronic medical record review was used to determine outcomes before and after QI activities in a multispecialty ambulatory clinic of a tertiary care Veterans Affairs facility and its affiliated satellite clinics. From 1869 FOBT-positive cases, 800 were randomly selected from time periods before and after QI activities. Two reviewers used a pretested standardized data collection form to determine whether colonoscopy was appropriate or indicated based on predetermined criteria and if so, the timeliness of colonoscopy referral and performance before and after QI activities.
resultsIn cases where a colonoscopy was indicated, the proportion of patients who received a timely colonoscopy referral and performance were significantly higher post-implementation (60.5% vs. 31.7%, P<0.0001 and 11.4% vs. 3.4%, P=0.0005). A significant decrease also resulted in median times to referral and performance (6 vs. 19 days, P<0.0001 and 96.5 vs. 190 days, P<0.0001) and in the proportion of positive-FOBT test results that had received no follow-up by the time of chart review (24.3% vs. 35.9%, P=0.0045). Significant predictors of absence of the performance of an indicated colonoscopy included performance of a non-colonoscopy procedure such as barium enema or flexible sigmoidoscopy (OR=16.9; 95% CI, 1.9-145.1), patient non-adherence (OR=33.9; 95% CI, 17.3-66.6), not providing an appropriate provisional diagnosis on the consultation (OR=17.9; 95% CI, 11.3-28.1), and gastroenterology service not rescheduling colonoscopies after an initial cancellation (OR=11.0; 95% CI, 5.1-23.7).
conclusionsMultifaceted QI activities improved rates of timely colonoscopy referral and performance in an electronic medical record system. However, colonoscopy was not indicated in over one third of patients with positive FOBTs, raising concerns about current screening practices and the appropriate denominator used for performance measurement standards related to colon cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.