Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19293338›Full record

ArticleHuman molecular genetics2009

Molecular mechanisms for subtelomeric rearrangements associated with the 9q34.3 microdeletion syndrome.

Svetlana A Yatsenko, Ellen K Brundage, Erin K Roney, Sau Wai Cheung, A Craig Chinault, James R Lupski

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human molecular genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Decoding NF1 Intragenic Copy-Number Variations.American journal of human genetics · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Svetlana A YatsenkoDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Ellen K Brundage
Erin K Roney
Sau Wai Cheung
A Craig Chinault
James R Lupski
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING FXTAS AMONG MALES WITH THE FMR1 PREMUTATIONP30HD024064 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZOGHBI, HUDA Y · 1988 to 2013
$29.4M
Telomere integrity of de novo terminal deletionsP01HD039420 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2001 to 2005
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD24064NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We characterized at the molecular level the genomic rearrangements in 28 unrelated patients with 9q34.3 subtelomeric deletions. Four distinct categories were delineated: terminal deletions, interstitial deletions, derivative chromosomes and complex rearrangements; each results in haploinsufficiency of the EHMT1 gene and a characteristic phenotype. Interestingly, 25% of our patients had de novo interstitial deletions, 25% were found with derivative chromosomes and complex rearrangements and only 50% were bona fide terminal deletions. In contrast to genomic disorders that are often associated with recurrent rearrangements, breakpoints involving the 9q34.3 subtelomere region are highly variable. Molecular studies identified three regions of breakpoint grouping. Interspersed repetitive elements such as Alu, LINE, long-terminal repeats and simple tandem repeats are frequently observed at the breakpoints. Such repetitive elements may play an important role by providing substrates with a specific DNA secondary structure that stabilizes broken chromosomes or assist in either DNA double-strand break repair or repair of single double-strand DNA ends generated by collapsed forks. Sequence analyses of the breakpoint junctions suggest that subtelomeric deletions can be stabilized by both homologous and nonhomologous recombination mechanisms, through a telomere-capture event, by de novo telomere synthesis, or multistep breakage-fusion-bridge cycles.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementSequence DeletionAdolescentAdultBase SequenceChildChild, PreschoolChromosome BreakageChromosome DisordersChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 9FemaleHumansInfantMaleMolecular Sequence Data

Identifiers

PMID19293338
PMCPMC2678925
OpenAlexW2119992899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.