Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19292898›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2009

Chromato-panning: an efficient new mode of identifying suitable ligands from phage display libraries.

Wim Noppe, Fatima Plieva, Igor Yu Galaev, Hans Pottel, Hans Deckmyn, Bo Mattiasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Naïve Human Antibody Libraries for Infectious Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Progress in phage display: evolution of the technique and its application.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wim NoppeDepartment of Biotechnology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. Wim.Noppe@kuleuven-kortrijk.be
Fatima Plieva
Igor Yu Galaev
Hans Pottel
Hans Deckmyn
Bo Mattiasson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhage Display technology is a well established technique for high throughput screening of affinity ligands. Here we describe a new compact chromato-panning procedure for selection of suitable binders from a phage peptide display library.

resultsBoth phages and E. coli cells pass non-hindered through the interconnected pores of macroporous gel, so called cryogel. After coupling a ligand to a monolithic cryogel column, the phage library was applied on the column and non-bound phages were washed out. The selection of strong phage-binders was achieved already after the first panning cycle due to the efficient separation of phage-binders from phage-non-binders in chromatographic mode rather than in batch mode as in traditional biopanning procedures. E. coli cells were applied on the column for infection with the specifically bound phages.

conclusionChromato-panning allows combining several steps of the panning procedure resulting in 4-8 fold decrease of total time needed for phage selection.

Indexed as

Peptide LibraryCold TemperatureEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEscherichia coliHydrogelsLactoferrinLigandsPeptidesSubstrate SpecificityHydrogelsLactoferrinLigandsPeptide LibraryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID19292898
PMCPMC2667499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.