Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19292747›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2009

Reliability of reported breastfeeding duration among reproductive-aged women from Mexico.

Lea A Cupul-Uicab, Beth C Gladen, Mauricio Hernández-Avila, Matthew P Longnecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Reliability of Maternal Recall of Feeding at the Breast and Breast Milk Expression 6 Years After Delivery.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation Study of Maternal Recall on Breastfeeding Duration 6 Years After Childbirth.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Are Mothers Certain About Their Perceptions of Recalled Infant Feeding History?Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lea A Cupul-UicabCenter for Population Health Research, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 62508 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. cupuluicabl@niehs.nih.gov
Beth C Gladen
Mauricio Hernández-Avila
Matthew P Longnecker

Funding

Study of Health Effects of DDT in MexicoZIAES044009 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2009 to 2017
$312k
Study of Health Effects of DDT in MexicoZ01ES044009 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LONGNECKER, MATTHEW P · 2001 to 2008
$95k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044009Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999NIEHS NIH HHS N01-ES-15467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfed children have lower risk of infectious diseases, post-neonatal mortality and chronic diseases later in life. Because epidemiologic studies usually rely on reported history of previous breastfeeding, data on the accuracy and precision of recalled histories allow improved interpretation of the epidemiologic findings. We evaluated the reliability of two reported breastfeeding durations in 567 reproductive-aged women from Mexico using information obtained from nearly identical sets of questions applied at different times after weaning. We compared differences between reports, and examined the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for any and for exclusive breastfeeding (EBF). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the determinants of poor recall (difference between reports of >20%). The reliability of duration of any breastfeeding was high (ICC 0.94). Overall, differences between reports of duration were usually <1 month, and for 385/567, the difference was < or =0.5 months. Predictors of poorer recall were having > or =4 children, and time between reports of >2 months. The only predictor of better recall was greater age of the baby at weaning. The reliability of EBF duration was lower (ICC 0.49). In this population with a relatively long duration of breastfeeding, reliability of any breastfeeding duration was high. Age, education and previous breastfeeding were not important predictors of recall, in contrast to findings in earlier studies. Consistent with previous reports, however, parity and length of recall were associated with poorer recall of duration of any breastfeeding. Future studies that use reported breastfeeding duration may want to consider the effect of these variables on recall.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBirth WeightBreast FeedingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMental RecallMexicoPovertyReproducibility of ResultsRural Population

Identifiers

PMID19292747
PMCPMC2923918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.