ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2008
Cancer and forensic microsatellites.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of genetic instability of short tandem repeats in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- InDEL instability in two different tumoral tissues and its forensic significance.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2024Article
- Exploration of identifying individual tumor tissue based on probabilistic model.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Association of Angiogenesis Gene Expression With Cancer Prognosis and Immunotherapy Efficacy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of reliability on STR typing at leukemic patients used for forensic purposes.Molecular biology reports · 2014Article
- The effect on cadaver blood DNA identification by the use of targeted and whole body post-mortem computed tomography angiography.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2013Article
- DNA reviews: DNA identification following CBRN incidents.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although not directly related, circumstances do occur in forensic investigations whereby cancer studies and forensic science cross paths. This review takes a look at the circumstances under which this may occur, and investigates some potential problems that can arise when tumor tissue is submitted for DNA profile analysis. A background to the underlying molecular biology of tumors is described, highlighting the genetic instabilities that are observed in DNA sequences of similar or identical primary structure to the short tandem repeat markers used in forensic DNA profiling kits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19291472What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.