Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19289752›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatology2009

Incidence of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, 1965-2005: a population-based study.

Olayemi Durosaro, Mark D P Davis, Kurtis B Reed, Audrey L Rohlinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Incidence of cutaneous lupus erythematosus and systemic progression: A Nationwide study in Korea.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. [Lupus erythematosus].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus: A scoping review.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olayemi DurosaroMayo Medical School, College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mark D P Davis
Kurtis B Reed
Audrey L Rohlinger

Funding

Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
ROCHESTER EPIDEMIOLOGY PROJECTR01AR030582 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A · 1986 to 2009
$5.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR030582NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess trends in the cutaneous variants of lupus erythematosus (CLE) and to ascertain the incidence of CLE over the past 4 decades.

designRetrospective population-based study.

settingCommunity-based epidemiology project. PATIENTS: All Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with any subtype of CLE between January 1965 and December 2005.

main outcome measuresIncidence of CLE and disease progression to systemic LE (SLE).

resultsA total of 156 patients with newly diagnosed CLE (100 females and 56 males) were identified between 1965 and 2005. The incidence rate (age and sex adjusted to the 2000 US white population) was 4.30 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.62-4.98) per 100,000. The age- and sex-adjusted prevalence as of January 1, 2006, was 73.24 (95% CI, 58.29-88.19) per 100,000. Nineteen patients with CLE had disease progression to SLE: cumulative incidence at 20 years, 19%; mean (SD) length to progression, 8.2 (6.3) years. Compared with a previously reported incidence of 2.78 (95% CI, 2.08-3.49) per 100,000 for SLE among Rochester, Minnesota, residents in 1965 through 1992, the incidence of CLE in Rochester was 3.08 (95% CI, 2.32-3.83) per 100,000 in 1965 through 1992.

conclusionsThe incidence of CLE is comparable to the published incidence of SLE. Our findings double the incidence of the root designation of the disease process known as LE (SLE and CLE).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceLupus Erythematosus, CutaneousMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaPrevalenceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID19289752
PMCPMC3953616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.