Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19289751›Full record

ArticleArchives of dermatology2009

Lupus erythematosus tumidus: response to antimalarial treatment in 36 patients with emphasis on smoking.

Alexander Kreuter, Renata Gaifullina, Christian Tigges, Julia Kirschke, Peter Altmeyer, Thilo Gambichler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of dermatology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hydroxychloroquine in systemic lupus erythematosus: overview of current knowledge.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  9. Does smoking affect your skin?Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Lupus erythematosus tumidus: clinical perspectives.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Lupus erythematosus tumidus: a unique disease entity.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2014
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Update on pathogenesis and treatment of CLE.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2013
    Review
  19. Atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander KreuterConnective Tissue Disease Research Unit, Department of Dermatology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. a.kreuter@derma.de
Renata Gaifullina
Christian Tigges
Julia Kirschke
Peter Altmeyer
Thilo Gambichler
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the efficacy of antimalarial drug use in patients with lupus erythematosus tumidus.

designRetrospective single-center study.

settingDermatologic clinic at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients with multifocal lupus erythematosus tumidus. Intervention Treatment with either chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine sulfate.

main outcome measuresCutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index score.

resultsTreatment with antimalarial drugs resulted in a significant reduction in the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index score, from 4 (range, 2-8) at baseline to 1 (range, 0-6) after 3 months of therapy (P < .001). Twenty-two patients (61%) exhibited complete or almost complete clearance of skin lesions, consistent with a clinical score of 0 or 1. No difference in efficacy was noted between the chloroquine-treated group and the hydroxychloroquine-treated group (P = .40). Adverse effects (nausea, dizziness, and headache) occurred only in patients treated with chloroquine. Twenty-eight patients (78%) were smokers, and smokers had a significantly higher mean (SD) clinical score than nonsmokers (5.1 [1.8] vs 3.3 [1.6]; P = .03). Moreover, smokers had a significantly lower reduction in clinical score with antimalarial treatment compared with nonsmokers (r = 0.30; P = .03; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.57). Eighty-eight percent of nonsmokers (7 of 8 patients) but only 57% of smokers (16 of 28 patients) had a clinical score of 1 or 0 after 3 months of treatment with antimalarial drugs.

conclusionsThese retrospective study findings demonstrate that antimalarial treatment is highly effective in multifocal lupus erythematosus tumidus. Lower incidence of adverse effects and equal efficacy might favor the use of hydroxychloroquine. Patients who smoke should be encouraged to join smoking cessation programs because they will respond better to antimalarial treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntimalarialsChloroquineFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineLupus Erythematosus, CutaneousMaleMiddle AgedSmokingTreatment OutcomeAntimalarialsChloroquinechloroquine diphosphateHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID19289751
OpenAlexW2045603677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.