Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19289528›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2009

Potency and bactericidal activity of iclaprim against recent clinical gram-positive isolates.

Helio S Sader, Thomas R Fritsche, Ronald N Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Transcriptional Response ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Iclaprim activity against wild-type and corresponding thymidine kinase-deficient Staphylococcus aureus in a mouse protection model.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Evaluation ofAccess microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Efficacy evaluation of iclaprim in a neutropenic rat lung infection model with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus entrapped in alginate microspheres.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helio S SaderJMI Laboratories, 345 Beaver Kreek Centre, Suite A, North Liberty, IA 52317, USA. helio-sader@jmilabs.com
Thomas R Fritsche
Ronald N Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The in vitro activity of iclaprim, a novel diaminopyrimidine derivative, was evaluated against 5,937 recent gram-positive clinical isolates collected in the United States and Europe. Iclaprim demonstrated potent activity against Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]), beta-hemolytic Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus faecalis strains tested. In addition, iclaprim exhibited bactericidal activity against all S. aureus strains tested, including MRSA.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsEnterococcus faecalisEuropeGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsGram-Positive CocciHospitalizationHumansMethicillinMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyrimidinesStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcusUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsiclaprimMethicillinPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID19289528
PMCPMC2681558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.