ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Fluctuation analysis of tetanic rundown (short-term depression) at a corticothalamic synapse.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological mechanisms of thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus stimulation for tremor suppression.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2018Article
- Short-term presynaptic plasticity.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2012Review
- Measuring action potential-evoked transmission at individual synaptic contacts.Journal of neural engineering · 2012Article
- Short-term forms of presynaptic plasticity.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypothetical scenarios for "tetanic rundown" ("short-term depression") of synaptic signals evoked by stimulus trains differ in evolution of quantal amplitude (Q) and covariances between signals. With corticothalamic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) evoked by 2.5- to 20-Hz trains, we found Q (estimated using various corrections of variance/mean ratios) to be unchanged during rundown and close to the size of stimulus-evoked "miniatures". Except for covariances, results were compatible with a depletion model, according to which incomplete "refill" after probabilistic quantal release entails release-site "emptying". For five neurons with 20 train repetitions at each frequency, there was little between-neuron variation of rundown; pool-refill rate increased with stimulus frequency and evolved during rundown. Covariances did not fit the depletion model or theoretical alternatives, being excessively negative for adjacent EPSCs early in trains, absent at equilibrium, and anomalously positive for some nonadjacent EPSCs. The anomalous covariances were unaltered during pharmacological blockade of receptor desensitization and saturation. These findings suggest that pool-refill rate and release probability at each release site are continually modulated by antecedent outputs in its neighborhood, possibly via feedback mechanisms. In all data sets, sampling errors for between-train variances were much less than theoretical, warranting reconsideration of the probabilistic nature of quantal transmitter release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.