Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19289024›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2009

Thrombophilia: 2009 update.

Pat Foy, Stephan Moll

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Testing for Factor V Leiden (FVL) and Prothrombin G20210A Genetic Variants.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Role of thrombophilia testing: con.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pat FoyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB7035, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Stephan Moll
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As venous thrombosis is mostly caused by disturbances in the plasma coagulation system, abnormalities of coagulation factors are mostly risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Relatively little is known about thrombophilias that predispose to arterial thromboembolism. Although some abnormalities in the fibrinolytic pathway appear to predispose to arterial thrombosis, the associations are weak and often inconsistent between studies. At present, there is not enough consistent and clinically meaningful information to include fibrinolytic parameters in a clinical thrombophilia workup. Controversy exists as to which patients and family members to test for thrombophilia. Several testing guidelines exist. Routine screening for inherited thrombophilias is not indicated in patients with VTE provoked by immobility, surgery, and malignancy, or in those with arterial thrombosis with arteriosclerosis risk factors. Heterozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin 20210 mutations increase the risk for recurrent VTE only slightly once anticoagulation is stopped. Therefore, decisions regarding the length of anticoagulant therapy typically are not influenced by finding one of these heterozygous mutations. The main reason to perform thrombophilia testing in a patient is to detect a strong thrombophilia (ie, antithrombin deficiency, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, homozygous FVL, double-heterozygous FVL plus prothrombin 20210 mutation, protein C deficiency, and maybe protein S deficiency). The finding of a strong thrombophilia has several clinical consequences: it decreases the threshold to recommend long-term anticoagulation in a patient with unprovoked VTE; facilitates discussion regarding whether anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy is the preferred empiric treatment for a patient who had an unexplained arterial, nonarteriosclerotic thromboembolic event; and leads to the consideration of testing asymptomatic female family members for the identified thrombophilia(s) so they can be counseled on their risk of thromboembolism, the use of hormonal therapies, and the potential benefit of pre- and postpartum anticoagulant therapy.

Identifiers

PMID19289024
OpenAlexW1985802022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.