ArticlePrimary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry2008
Immediate and 8-month impact of a medical educational course for general practitioners on knowledge about schizophrenia and its treatment: results of a 3-phase study from Brescia, Italy.
Article in Primary care companion to the Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient and Physician Factors Associated with First Diagnosis of Non-affective Psychotic Disorder in Primary Care.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo test the efficacy of a training course on the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia, tailored for the general practitioner.
methodA course, in a 3-session format, was given to 215 primary care doctors from the city of Brescia and its province, in Italy. All 706 doctors working in primary care were asked to participate. Of these doctors, 30.5% took part in the study. The first session (215 doctors) assessed baseline knowledge of schizophrenia (June 2002), the second (173 doctors) gave formal teaching and assessed post-lesson knowledge (October 2002), and the third (130 doctors) evaluated the retention of knowledge after 8 months (July 2003). The main outcome measures were total number of schizophrenia symptoms identified, total number of antipsychotics identified, and knowledge about antipsychotic-related adverse events.
resultsPost-lesson, general practitioners could identify 6.5 more symptoms (p < .001) and 4.9 more antipsychotics (p < .001). Compared to baseline, 71.5% vs. 15.4% of doctors had a good knowledge of antipsychotic-related adverse events. Although a loss of knowledge was found after the 8-month follow-up, knowledge at the endpoint was significantly higher than at baseline for the 3 main outcome variables (p < .001).
conclusionThe teaching course on schizophrenia for general practitioners was effective, and the knowledge gained after teaching was stable across time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.