ArticleAnatomy and embryology1991
Limits to the dependence of developing neurons on protein synthesis in their axonal target territory.
Article in Anatomy and embryology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presynaptic initiation by action potentials of retrograde signals in developing neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1997Article
- Limits to the dependence of developing neurons on protein synthesis in their axonal target territory.Anatomy and embryology · 1991Article
- Developmental cell death: morphological diversity and multiple mechanisms.Anatomy and embryology · 1990Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our basic question was whether the survival of developing neurons is critically dependent on the level of protein synthesis in the axonal target region. The experiments were carried out on the projection from the isthmo-optic nucleus (ION) to the contralateral retina in chick embryos. The ION is known to undergo almost 60% neuronal death between embryonic days (E) 12 and E17 and to be critically dependent on the retina for trophic support throughout this period and shortly afterwards. Various concentrations of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide were infused into one eye from E15 to E19. Moderate inhibition (up to about 40%) of retinal protein synthesis, which did not lead to retinal degeneration, had no detectable effects on the number of neurons, nor on the general morphology, in the ION. Only when the inhibition was as high as 50%, leading to widespread degeneration in the retina, did massive degeneration occur also in the ION. It was also shown that a single intraocular injection of cycloheximide at E15 that inhibited retinal protein synthesis by as much as 70-90% during the subsequent 24 h had little effect on the ION in embryos fixed at E19. These results indicate that although the ION neurons are critically dependent on the retina, they can resist major reductions in the level of retinal protein synthesis, which argues against the widespread belief that neuronal survival during development is regulated by the limited production of trophic molecules in the axonal target area. The data are, however, compatible with alternative hypotheses. Most plausibly, survival may be regulated by limited access to a nonlimiting supply of trophic molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.