Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19286686›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2009

Impediments to eye transplantation: ocular viability following optic-nerve transection or enucleation.

D Ellenberg, J Shi, S Jain, J-H Chang, H Ripps, S Brady, E R Melhem, F Lakkis, A Adamis, D-F Chen and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Ethical Considerations of Whole-Eye Transplantation.The Journal of clinical ethics · 2016
    Review
  12. Nanomedicine approaches for corneal diseases.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2015
    Review
  13. Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2015
    Review
  14. Ophthalmic transplantology: anterior segment of the eye - part I.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

D EllenbergDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
J Shi
S Jain
J-H Chang
H Ripps
S Brady
E R Melhem
F Lakkis
A Adamis
D-F Chen
R Ellis-Behnke
R S Langer
S M Strittmatter
D T Azar
University of Illinois Chicago · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USYale University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR DETERMINANTS OF AXONAL REGENERATIONR01NS039962 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STRITTMATTER, STEPHEN M · 2000 to 2010
$3.9M
Nogo Receptor in Axonal RegenerationR01NS042304 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STRITTMATTER, STEPHEN M · 2001 to 2010
$3.3M
Nogo Receptor Antagonist for Ischemic Stroke RecoveryR01NS056485 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STRITTMATTER, STEPHEN M · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS039962NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042304NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS056485PHS HHS P30-001792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of ocular viability is one of the major impediments to successful whole-eye transplantation. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the current literature to help guide future studies in order to overcome this hurdle. A systematic multistage review of published literature was performed. Three specific questions were addressed: (1) Is recovery of visual function following eye transplantation greater in cold-blooded vertebrates when compared with mammals? (2) Is outer retina function following enucleation and reperfusion improved compared with enucleation alone? (3) Following optic-nerve transection, is there a correlation between retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival and either time after transection or proximity of the transection to the globe? In a majority of the studies performed in the literature, recovery of visual function can occur after whole-eye transplantation in cold-blooded vertebrates. Following enucleation (and reperfusion), outer retinal function is maintained from 4 to 9 h. RGC survival following optic-nerve transection is inversely related to both the time since transection and the proximity of transection to the globe. Lastly, neurotrophins can increase RGC survival following optic-nerve transection. This review of the literature suggests that the use of a donor eye is feasible for whole-eye transplantation.

Indexed as

AnimalsEyeEye EnucleationOptic Nerve InjuriesRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsTissue DonorsTissue SurvivalVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID19286686
PMCPMC2850278
OpenAlexW2103777005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.