Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19284741›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2009

Mechanisms of antagonism of the GluR2 AMPA receptor: structure and dynamics of the complex of two willardiine antagonists with the glutamate binding domain.

Ahmed H Ahmed, Melissa D Thompson, Michael K Fenwick, Bethsabe Romero, Adrienne P Loh, David E Jane, Holger Sondermann, Robert E Oswald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed H AhmedDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Melissa D Thompson
Michael K Fenwick
Bethsabe Romero
Adrienne P Loh
David E Jane
Holger Sondermann
Robert E Oswald
Cornell University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–La Crosse · US

Funding

ZINC FINGER-DNA COMPLEXP41RR001646 · NCRR · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI CINGOLANI, GINO · 1985 to 2011
$23.8M
Dynamic properties of a glutamate binding domainR01GM068935 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI OSWALD, ROBERT E · 2005 to 2018
$3.4M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C507045/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F012519/1Medical Research Council G0601812NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001646NCRR NIH HHS RR-01646NIGMS NIH HHS DMR-0225180NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068935NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM068935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors mediate the majority of vertebrate excitatory synaptic transmission. The development of selective antagonists for glutamate receptor subtypes is of interest in the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders. This study presents the crystal structure of the binding domain of GluR2 bound to two antagonists (UBP277 and UBP282) that are derivatives of the natural product, willardiine. The antagonists bind to one lobe of the protein with interactions similar to agonists. Interaction with the second lobe differs between the two antagonists, resulting in a different position of the uracil ring and different orientations of the bilobed structure. UBP277 binding produces a stable lobe orientation that is similar to the apo state, but the binding of UBP282 produces the largest hyperextension of the lobes yet reported for an AMPA receptor. The carboxyethyl (UBP277) and carboxybenzyl (UBP282) substituents in the N(3) position keep the lobes separated by a "foot-in-the-door" mechanism and the internal dynamics are minimal compared to the CNQX-bound form of the protein (which makes minimal contacts with one of the two lobes). In contrast to the antagonists CNQX and DNQX, UBP277 and UBP282 produce complexes with higher thermal stability, but affinities that are more than 100-fold lower. These structures support the idea that antagonism is associated with the overall orientation of the lobes rather than with specific interactions, and antagonism can rise either from specific interactions with both lobes ("foot-in-the-door" mechanism) or from the lack of extensive interactions with one of the two lobes.

Indexed as

AlanineCalorimetryCrystallography, X-RayExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGlutamic AcidMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyModels, MolecularProtein ConformationRadioligand AssayReceptors, AMPAUracilAlanineExcitatory Amino Acid Antagonistsglutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 2Glutamic AcidReceptors, AMPAUracilwillardiine

Identifiers

PMID19284741
PMCPMC2693247
OpenAlexW2105603644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.